On Thu 2008-01-24 09:46:57, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:37 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Did we decide not to do something with a variable number of
> > arguments?
> > >
> > > sys_clonefoo(unsigned long *flags, int len);
> >
> > That is evil, because that means strace c
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:37 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Did we decide not to do something with a variable number of
> arguments?
> >
> > sys_clonefoo(unsigned long *flags, int len);
>
> That is evil, because that means strace can no longer reliably print
> flags being used (for example).
On Thu 2008-01-24 09:24:34, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:09 +0100, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> > yes but we would need more something like :
> >
> > long sys_clone64(unsigned long flags_high, unsigned long flag_low)
> >
> > if we want the syscall to be supported on 32bit arch. c
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:09 +0100, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> yes but we would need more something like :
>
> long sys_clone64(unsigned long flags_high, unsigned long flag_low)
>
> if we want the syscall to be supported on 32bit arch. clone2 is also
> being used on ia64 already.
Did we decide
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2008-01-16 15:58:55, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> There's only one bit in the clone_flags left, so we won't be able
>> to create more namespaces after we make it busy. Besides, for
>> checkpoint/restart jobs we might want to create tasks with given
>> pids (virtual of co
On Wed 2008-01-16 15:58:55, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> There's only one bit in the clone_flags left, so we won't be able
> to create more namespaces after we make it busy. Besides, for
> checkpoint/restart jobs we might want to create tasks with given
> pids (virtual of course). And nobody knows fo
Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:23:40AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Hi, Pavel,
>>
>> [Adding Ulrich]
>>
>>> I use the last bit in the clone_flags for CLONE_LONGARG. When set it
>>> will denote that the child_tidptr is not a pointer to a tid storage,
>>> but the pointer to the struc
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:23:40AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Hi, Pavel,
>
> [Adding Ulrich]
>
> > I use the last bit in the clone_flags for CLONE_LONGARG. When set it
> > will denote that the child_tidptr is not a pointer to a tid storage,
> > but the pointer to the struct long_clone_struct
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Hi, Pavel,
>
> [Adding Ulrich]
>
>> I use the last bit in the clone_flags for CLONE_LONGARG. When set it
>> will denote that the child_tidptr is not a pointer to a tid storage,
>> but the pointer to the struct long_clone_struct which currently
>> looks like this:
>
> I'
Hi, Pavel,
[Adding Ulrich]
> I use the last bit in the clone_flags for CLONE_LONGARG. When set it
> will denote that the child_tidptr is not a pointer to a tid storage,
> but the pointer to the struct long_clone_struct which currently
> looks like this:
I'm probably just totally off the deep en
10 matches
Mail list logo
