On 03/04/2019 10:08:52-0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 18:22 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > The X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a
> > couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the
> > current DT files claim.
> []
> > dif
On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 18:22 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> The X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a
> couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the
> current DT files claim.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts
On 03/04/2019 at 18:22, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> The X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a
> couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the
> current DT files claim.
>
> [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html
> [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT
3 matches
Mail list logo