On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> In the future, you need to tell me to drop the old ones from my queue.
> Normally you can do that by replying to them saying to remove them, or
> put a "v2" for "version 2" on this series.
>
> Anyway, as Mark told you to redo them a bit,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:53:36AM +0800, ZHAO Gang wrote:
> > I'm a bit confused - these patches apply to the current head of
> > staging-next, but not on top of your previous two patches. I assume that
> > you're aiming to have these changes on top of your last two, so can you
> > please re-spin
> Hi, please revert the previous two patches if you can.
I mean drop/ignore previous two patches, just apply this 4 patches to
staging-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
> I'm a bit confused - these patches apply to the current head of
> staging-next, but not on top of your previous two patches. I assume that
> you're aiming to have these changes on top of your last two, so can you
> please re-spin them to apply cleanly to the head of (staging-next + your
> previou
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 08:27:58PM +0800, ZHAO Gang wrote:
> 1. change function name: et1310_phy_power_down -> et1310_phy_power_switch
> change function name to better describe its functionality.
>
> 2. as TODO file suggested, do this sort of things to reduce split lines
> struct fbr_lookup *fbr;
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
