On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> BTW, I don't recall ever seeing Tony's patch announced on
> linux-usb or linux-usb-devel. Did I simply miss it?
I think he didn't post it. I got some questions from him at
one point, which I answered, but as I recall he decided for
some re
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:26:43AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:49:52PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > > It looks like Greg misused the debugfs API -- which is ironic, because
> > > > >
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:13:08AM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:00:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Ok, no, I didn't write that patch, I'm getting very confused here.
> >
> > In 2.6.24-rc6 there is no usage of debugfs in the ohci driver.
> >
> > In the -mm tree t
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:00:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Ok, no, I didn't write that patch, I'm getting very confused here.
>
> In 2.6.24-rc6 there is no usage of debugfs in the ohci driver.
>
> In the -mm tree there is a patch, from Tony Jones, that moves some debug
> code out of sysfs an
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 03:34:45PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> It looks like Greg misused the debugfs API -- which is ironic, because
> he wrote debugfs in the first place! :-)
>
> Let me know if this patch fixes the problem. If it does, I'll submit
> it to Greg with all the proper accoutre
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:26:43AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:49:52PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > > It looks like Greg misused the debugfs API -- which is ironic, because
> > > > he wrote debugfs in the first place! :-)
> > >
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:49:52PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > > It looks like Greg misused the debugfs API -- which is ironic, because
> > > he wrote debugfs in the first place! :-)
> >
> > Oh crap, sorry, I did mess that up :(
> >
> > > Let me know if
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > It looks like Greg misused the debugfs API -- which is ironic, because
> > he wrote debugfs in the first place! :-)
>
> Oh crap, sorry, I did mess that up :(
>
> > Let me know if this patch fixes the problem. If it does, I'll submit
> > it to Greg with
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 03:34:45PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > * Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > (yes, that's all there is, despite CONFIG_USB_DEBUG being set)
> > >
> > > The LED of a usb stick isn't active either, for obvious reaso
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (yes, that's all there is, despite CONFIG_USB_DEBUG being set)
> >
> > The LED of a usb stick isn't active either, for obvious reasons.
> >
> > And keep in mind that this is a (relatively old) OHCI-only ma
* Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (yes, that's all there is, despite CONFIG_USB_DEBUG being set)
>
> The LED of a usb stick isn't active either, for obvious reasons.
>
> And keep in mind that this is a (relatively old) OHCI-only machine...
> (which had the 2.6.19 lsmod showing ohci-h
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:22:01AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:17:28PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > And this is the state that my 2.6.24-rc_six_-mm1 tree is in already.
>
> OK.
>
> > So either it didn't help here or it broke again by some later change or
> >
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:17:28PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 09:41:45PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:40:56PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:23:42AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > (commit 2b1e300a
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 09:41:45PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:40:56PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:23:42AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > (commit 2b1e300a9dfc3196ccddf6f1d74b91b7af55e416)
> > > >
> > > > This seems to have brok
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:40:56PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:23:42AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > (commit 2b1e300a9dfc3196ccddf6f1d74b91b7af55e416)
> > >
> > > This seems to have broken the use of /proc/bus/usb as a mountpoint. It
> > > always appears empty now,
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:23:42AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > (commit 2b1e300a9dfc3196ccddf6f1d74b91b7af55e416)
> >
> > This seems to have broken the use of /proc/bus/usb as a mountpoint. It
> > always appears empty now, whatever's supposed to be mounted there.
> >
>
> Yes. Denis and
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:51:37 + David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 15:17 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Well I clearly goofed when I added the initial network namespace support
>>> for /proc/net. Currently things work but there are
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:51:37 + David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 15:17 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Well I clearly goofed when I added the initial network namespace support
> > for /proc/net. Currently things work but there are odd details visible
> > t
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 15:17 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Well I clearly goofed when I added the initial network namespace support
> for /proc/net. Currently things work but there are odd details visible
> to user space, even when we have a single network namespace.
>
> Since we do not cache
Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [snip]
>
>>
>> Well I clearly goofed when I added the initial network namespace support
>> for /proc/net. Currently things work but there are odd details visible
>> to user space, even when we have a single network namespace.
>>
>> Since we do not c
[snip]
>
> Well I clearly goofed when I added the initial network namespace support
> for /proc/net. Currently things work but there are odd details visible
> to user space, even when we have a single network namespace.
>
> Since we do not cache proc_dir_entry dentries at the moment we can
> ju
21 matches
Mail list logo
