David, Koichi,
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 09:52 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 10.02.2014 09:49, schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> I assumed that every kernel developer is aware of that fact that
> >> unreachable/dead code
> >> shoul
Am 10.02.2014 09:49, schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 09.02.2014 21:15, schrieb Paul Bolle:
>>> On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 21:04 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 09.02.2014 20:38, schrieb Paul Bolle:
> But now you've enabled a lot
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 09.02.2014 21:15, schrieb Paul Bolle:
>> On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 21:04 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am 09.02.2014 20:38, schrieb Paul Bolle:
But now you've enabled a lot of stuff that, as far as I can tell, could
not ha
On 02/09/2014 07:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 02/09/2014 07:07 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Feel free to open a new thread, with
On 02/09/2014 07:07 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>>
>>> Feel free to open a new thread, with the relevant details, and involve
>>> the relevant people and lists. I have no idea what you're goi
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> >
> >Feel free to open a new thread, with the relevant details, and involve
> >the relevant people and lists. I have no idea what you're going on about
> >and could not care less (in the
On 02/09/2014 01:38 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 09.02.2014 22:35, schrieb Guenter Roeck:
I could understand if you would replace DEPRECATED with BROKEN,
but causing a potentially large number of broken builds and
then leave it to others to clean up the resulting mess doesn't
make any sense
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 17:41 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> >What has this got to do with an invalid Kconfig dependency in
>> >arch/mn10300?
>>
>> Probably not much
>
>Feel free to open a new thread, with
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 17:41 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> >What has this got to do with an invalid Kconfig dependency in
> >arch/mn10300?
>
> Probably not much
Feel free to open a new thread, with the relevant details, and involve
the relevant people
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 16:54 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> And much of it is in a bad make oldconfig that I can't date, but all of
>> the multimedia stuff has been stripped and I can no longer use my
>> pcHDTV3000 card as just one for instance. I just
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 16:54 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> And much of it is in a bad make oldconfig that I can't date, but all of the
> multimedia stuff has been stripped and I can no longer use my pcHDTV3000
> card as just one for instance. I just tested it, using an oldconfig that
> contained
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>Am 09.02.2014 22:35, schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>> I could understand if you would replace DEPRECATED with BROKEN,
>> but causing a potentially large number of broken builds and
>> then leave it to others to clean up the resulting mess doesn't
>> m
Am 09.02.2014 22:35, schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> I could understand if you would replace DEPRECATED with BROKEN,
> but causing a potentially large number of broken builds and
> then leave it to others to clean up the resulting mess doesn't
> make any sense to me and should, in my opinion, be rejected.
On 02/09/2014 12:04 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 09.02.2014 20:38, schrieb Paul Bolle:
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
The symbol is an orphan, get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
arch/mn10300/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 inserti
Am 09.02.2014 21:15, schrieb Paul Bolle:
> On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 21:04 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 09.02.2014 20:38, schrieb Paul Bolle:
>>> But now you've enabled a lot of stuff that, as far as I can tell, could
>>> not have been built since v2.6.39.
>>
>> This is by design. If the code
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 21:04 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 09.02.2014 20:38, schrieb Paul Bolle:
> > But now you've enabled a lot of stuff that, as far as I can tell, could
> > not have been built since v2.6.39.
>
> This is by design. If the code does not build/work it needs to be fixed or
Am 09.02.2014 20:38, schrieb Paul Bolle:
> On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> The symbol is an orphan, get rid of it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
>> ---
>> arch/mn10300/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> The symbol is an orphan, get rid of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
> ---
> arch/mn10300/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mn10300/Kconfig.debug b/arch/mn10300/Kcon
18 matches
Mail list logo
