On 9 April 2018 at 09:53, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22-03-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 22 March 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > On 22-03-18, 10:30, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> >> On 22 December 2017 at 08:26, Viresh Kumar
>> >> wrote:
>
>> >> > + ret = device_add(&genpd->dev);
>>
On 22-03-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 22 March 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 22-03-18, 10:30, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> On 22 December 2017 at 08:26, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> > + ret = device_add(&genpd->dev);
> >>
> >> What's the point of adding the device? Can we skip thi
On 22 March 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22-03-18, 10:30, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 22 December 2017 at 08:26, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > The power-domain core would be using the OPP core going forward and the
>> > OPP core has the basic requirement of a device structure for its working.
On 22-03-18, 10:30, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 22 December 2017 at 08:26, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The power-domain core would be using the OPP core going forward and the
> > OPP core has the basic requirement of a device structure for its working.
>
> According to the OPP core also seems to require
On 22 December 2017 at 08:26, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The power-domain core would be using the OPP core going forward and the
> OPP core has the basic requirement of a device structure for its working.
According to the OPP core also seems to require the ->dev.of_node to
be set. Actually, it seems l
5 matches
Mail list logo