On Wednesday 05 October 2016 01:52 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 10/04/16 16:02, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Peter Ujfalusi writes:
>>
>>> On 10/01/16 12:24, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
In any case, to configure the PBBR, you will have to introduce a driver
for it in drivers/memory. Th
On 10/04/16 16:02, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Peter Ujfalusi writes:
>
>> On 10/01/16 12:24, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> In any case, to configure the PBBR, you will have to introduce a driver
>>> for it in drivers/memory. Then you can set it up per board using a DT
>>> parameter.
>>
>> and w
On 10/04/16 12:20, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2016-09-30 21:19 GMT+02:00 Peter Ujfalusi :
>> On 09/30/2016 06:06 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>
>>> Just ran a quick test with speaker-test -c2 -twav. Besides the fact
>>> that the left and right channels are inverted (I'm looking into that),
>>
Peter Ujfalusi writes:
> On 10/01/16 12:24, Sekhar Nori wrote:
[...]
>> In any case, to configure the PBBR, you will have to introduce a driver
>> for it in drivers/memory. Then you can set it up per board using a DT
>> parameter.
>
> and we can reuse the introduced bindings for am335x and OMAP
2016-09-30 21:19 GMT+02:00 Peter Ujfalusi :
> On 09/30/2016 06:06 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>
>> Just ran a quick test with speaker-test -c2 -twav. Besides the fact
>> that the left and right channels are inverted (I'm looking into that),
>> I didn't notice any problems. Even at 1024x768 reso
On 10/01/16 12:24, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> That's good to hear, but I think the priorities should be set:
>> LCDC and EDMA30TC1 to highest priority
>> EDMA30TC0 to priority 2
>>
>> The 0TC0 is used by MMC and if you want to play a video you might need the
>> servicing TC to be higher priority then ot
On Saturday 01 October 2016 12:49 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 09/30/2016 06:06 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> 2016-09-30 14:59 GMT+02:00 Peter Ujfalusi :
>>> On 09/29/16 19:31, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
Default memory settings of da850 do not meet the throughput/latency
requirement
On 09/30/2016 06:06 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2016-09-30 14:59 GMT+02:00 Peter Ujfalusi :
>> On 09/29/16 19:31, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> Default memory settings of da850 do not meet the throughput/latency
>>> requirements of tilcdc. This results in the image displayed being
>>> incorre
2016-09-30 14:59 GMT+02:00 Peter Ujfalusi :
> On 09/29/16 19:31, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> Default memory settings of da850 do not meet the throughput/latency
>> requirements of tilcdc. This results in the image displayed being
>> incorrect and the following warning being displayed by the LCDC
On 09/29/16 19:31, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Default memory settings of da850 do not meet the throughput/latency
> requirements of tilcdc. This results in the image displayed being
> incorrect and the following warning being displayed by the LCDC
> drm driver:
>
> tilcdc da8xx_lcdc.0: tilcdc_
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski
wrote:
> 2016-09-29 21:07 GMT+02:00 Karl Beldan :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 06:31:55PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> Default memory settings of da850 do not meet the throughput/latency
>>> requirements of tilcdc. This results
2016-09-29 21:07 GMT+02:00 Karl Beldan :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 06:31:55PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> Default memory settings of da850 do not meet the throughput/latency
>> requirements of tilcdc. This results in the image displayed being
>> incorrect and the following warning
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 06:31:55PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Default memory settings of da850 do not meet the throughput/latency
> requirements of tilcdc. This results in the image displayed being
> incorrect and the following warning being displayed by the LCDC
> drm driver:
>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
