Tested-by: Philip Soares
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021, at 8:36 AM, nnet wrote:
> > Could I add your Tested-by line to patch series?
>
> Yes, by: Philip Soares
>
> Thank you for the patches!
>
> Could I add your Tested-by line to patch series?
Yes, by: Philip Soares
Thank you for the patches!
On Sunday 21 February 2021 19:17:40 nnet wrote:
> > Could you test if 1.155V voltage for L1 is stable on 1.2 GHz variant?
>
> ++#define MIN_VOLT_MV_FOR_L1_1200MHZ 1155
> ...
> ++ if (avs_min_l1 > dvfs->avs[0])
> ++ avs_min_l1 = dvfs->avs[0];
> ++
> ++
> Could you test if 1.155V voltage for L1 is stable on 1.2 GHz variant?
++#define MIN_VOLT_MV_FOR_L1_1200MHZ 1155
...
++ if (avs_min_l1 > dvfs->avs[0])
++ avs_min_l1 = dvfs->avs[0];
++
++ if (dvfs->avs[1] < avs_min_l1)
++
On Tuesday 16 February 2021 08:27:10 nnet wrote:
> > Therefore I'm thinking if the correct way is instead to use L1 := L0
> > voltage value for 1/1.2 GHz mode.
>
> This latest 04/10 works fine for me going 600MHz <-> 1.2GHz under with and
> without load.
Ok, thanks for testing! Just to note
> Therefore I'm thinking if the correct way is instead to use L1 := L0 voltage
> value for 1/1.2 GHz mode.
This latest 04/10 works fine for me going 600MHz <-> 1.2GHz under with and
without load.
On Monday 15 February 2021 21:48:08 nnet wrote:
> > Could you test following change instead of PATCH 04/10? I added here also
> > logic for 1.2 GHz variant with 1.132 V value another change is that
> > value for load L0 is not touched as it is stable.
>
> These changes to patch 04/10 worked going
> Could you test following change instead of PATCH 04/10? I added here also
> logic for 1.2 GHz variant with 1.132 V value another change is that
> value for load L0 is not touched as it is stable.
These changes to patch 04/10 worked going 600 MHz <-> 1.2 GHz , _but_ only with:
++#define
On Saturday 13 February 2021 10:30:19 nnet wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021, at 2:01 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 February 2021 16:41:13 nnet wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 11 February 2021 12:22:52 nnet wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021, at 2:01 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2021 16:41:13 nnet wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Thursday 11 February 2021 12:22:52 nnet wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > On
On Thursday 11 February 2021 16:41:13 nnet wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 February 2021 12:22:52 nnet wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 10 February 2021 11:08:59 nnet wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Feb
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2021 12:22:52 nnet wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 10 February 2021 11:08:59 nnet wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > > >
On Thursday 11 February 2021 12:22:52 nnet wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 February 2021 11:08:59 nnet wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > > Hello! Could you please enable userspace governor during kernel
> >
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2021 11:08:59 nnet wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > Hello! Could you please enable userspace governor during kernel
> > > > > compilation?
> > > > >
> > > > >
On Wednesday 10 February 2021 11:08:59 nnet wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Hello! Could you please enable userspace governor during kernel
> > > > compilation?
> > > >
> > > > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
> > > >
> > > > It can be activated via
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:08:59 -0800
nnet wrote:
> => md d0012604 1; md d0012604 1; md d0012604 1
> d0012604: 2b417501 .uA+
> d0012604: 945b [...
> d0012604:
So this means that in OTP you
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2021 09:34:07 nnet wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 1:23 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 February 2021 18:07:41 nnet wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:51 PM, nnet wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9,
On Wednesday 10 February 2021 09:34:07 nnet wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 1:23 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 February 2021 18:07:41 nnet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:51 PM, nnet wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:31 PM, nnet wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 1:23 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2021 18:07:41 nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:51 PM, nnet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:31 PM, nnet wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2021
On Tuesday 09 February 2021 18:07:41 nnet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:51 PM, nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:31 PM, nnet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:16:45 -0800
> > > > nnet wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I've two of
On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:51:53 -0800
nnet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:31 PM, nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
> > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:16:45 -0800
> > > nnet wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've two of these and I've just swapped them (and re-pasted the
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:51 PM, nnet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:31 PM, nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
> > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:16:45 -0800
> > > nnet wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've two of these and I've just swapped them (and re-pasted the heat
>
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:31 PM, nnet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:16:45 -0800
> > nnet wrote:
> >
> > > I've two of these and I've just swapped them (and re-pasted the heat
> > > sinks).
> > >
> > > The second one ran under load for
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:16:45 -0800
> nnet wrote:
>
> > I've two of these and I've just swapped them (and re-pasted the heat sinks).
> >
> > The second one ran under load for awhile and now has frozen as well.
> >
> > Under a moderate load
On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:16:45 -0800
nnet wrote:
> I've two of these and I've just swapped them (and re-pasted the heat sinks).
>
> The second one ran under load for awhile and now has frozen as well.
>
> Under a moderate load `wget -O /dev/null ` @X00Mbits they are fine.
>
> Under a 1 min
I've two of these and I've just swapped them (and re-pasted the heat sinks).
The second one ran under load for awhile and now has frozen as well.
Under a moderate load `wget -O /dev/null ` @X00Mbits they are fine.
Under a 1 min speed test of load ~200Mbits routed WireGuard they freeze.
They
On Tuesday 09 February 2021 14:52:56 nnet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 2:42 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:45:08 nnet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:00:26 nnet wrote:
> > > > > > If you have other
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 2:42 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:45:08 nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:00:26 nnet wrote:
> > > > > If you have other Armada 3720 boards (Espressobin v5/v7, uDPU, Devel
> > >
On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:45:08 nnet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:00:26 nnet wrote:
> > > > If you have other Armada 3720 boards (Espressobin v5/v7, uDPU, Devel
> > > > Board, ...) then it will be nice to do an additional
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:00:26 nnet wrote:
> > > If you have other Armada 3720 boards (Espressobin v5/v7, uDPU, Devel
> > > Board, ...) then it will be nice to do an additional tests and check if
> > > instability issues are finally
On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:00:26 nnet wrote:
> > If you have other Armada 3720 boards (Espressobin v5/v7, uDPU, Devel Board,
> > ...) then it will be nice to do an additional tests and check if
> > instability issues are finally fixed.
>
> These patches applied to the 5.4.96 in OpenWrt
> If you have other Armada 3720 boards (Espressobin v5/v7, uDPU, Devel Board,
> ...) then it will be nice to do an additional tests and check if instability
> issues are finally fixed.
These patches applied to the 5.4.96 in OpenWrt (98d61b5) work fine so far on an
Espressobin v7 AFAICT per
Hi Marek & Pali
On 1/14/21 1:40 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
The armada-37xx-cpufreq driver changes base CPU speed from 1000 MHz to
800 MHz on EspressoBIN and Turris MOX. The commit message in patch 2/10
explains why and how can this be discovered.
That patch 2/10 led us to discover another
W dniu 14.01.2021 o 13:40, Pali Rohár pisze:
> Hello!
>
> The armada-37xx-cpufreq driver changes base CPU speed from 1000 MHz to
> 800 MHz on EspressoBIN and Turris MOX. The commit message in patch 2/10
> explains why and how can this be discovered.
>
> That patch 2/10 led us to discover another
34 matches
Mail list logo
