Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: remove incorrect comment

2016-07-20 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 20-07-16 18:29:02, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: [...] > >From 7da52ca6920dcd84e3da2df619bd5242f9c3ccec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Naoya Horiguchi > Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:21:33 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: hwpoison: remove incorrect comment > > dequeue_hwpoisoned_huge_page() can be c

Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: remove incorrect comment

2016-07-20 Thread Naoya Horiguchi
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:10:53AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 19-07-16 11:08:18, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > dequeue_hwpoisoned_huge_page() can be called without page lock hold, > > so let's remove incorrect comment. > > Could you explain why the page lock is not really needed, please? Or

Re: [PATCH v1] mm: hugetlb: remove incorrect comment

2016-07-19 Thread Michal Hocko
On Tue 19-07-16 11:08:18, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > dequeue_hwpoisoned_huge_page() can be called without page lock hold, > so let's remove incorrect comment. Could you explain why the page lock is not really needed, please? Or what has changed that it is not needed anymore? Thanks! > > Reported-