On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> The 8 should be changed to SIZEOF_PTREGS in a later patch
>> ("x86/asm/head: standardize the end of the stack for idle tasks").
>
> But SIZEOF_PTREGS is
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> The 8 should be changed to SIZEOF_PTREGS in a later patch
>> ("x86/asm/head: standardize the end of the stack for idle tasks").
>
> But SIZEOF_PTREGS is 21*8. I don't
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 09:15:30AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >> The 8 should be changed to SIZEOF_PTREGS in a later patch
> >> ("x86/asm/head: standardize
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 09:15:30AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >> The 8 should be changed to SIZEOF_PTREGS in a later patch
> >> ("x86/asm/head: standardize the end of the
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> The 8 should be changed to SIZEOF_PTREGS in a later patch
> ("x86/asm/head: standardize the end of the stack for idle tasks").
But SIZEOF_PTREGS is 21*8. I don't understand.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> The 8 should be changed to SIZEOF_PTREGS in a later patch
> ("x86/asm/head: standardize the end of the stack for idle tasks").
But SIZEOF_PTREGS is 21*8. I don't understand.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 07:25:21AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > The 8 should be changed to SIZEOF_PTREGS in a later patch
> > ("x86/asm/head: standardize the end of the stack for idle tasks").
>
> But SIZEOF_PTREGS is 21*8. I
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 07:25:21AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > The 8 should be changed to SIZEOF_PTREGS in a later patch
> > ("x86/asm/head: standardize the end of the stack for idle tasks").
>
> But SIZEOF_PTREGS is 21*8. I
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:28:39AM -0500, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 17:21, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > The 'stack_start' variable is similar in usage to 'initial_code' and
> > 'initial_gs': they're all stored in head_64.S and they're all updated by
> > SMP and
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:28:39AM -0500, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 17:21, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > The 'stack_start' variable is similar in usage to 'initial_code' and
> > 'initial_gs': they're all stored in head_64.S and they're all updated by
> > SMP and ACPI suspend before
On 4 August 2016 at 17:21, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> The 'stack_start' variable is similar in usage to 'initial_code' and
> 'initial_gs': they're all stored in head_64.S and they're all updated by
> SMP and ACPI suspend before starting a CPU.
>
> Rename it to 'initial_stack' to
On 4 August 2016 at 17:21, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> The 'stack_start' variable is similar in usage to 'initial_code' and
> 'initial_gs': they're all stored in head_64.S and they're all updated by
> SMP and ACPI suspend before starting a CPU.
>
> Rename it to 'initial_stack' to be consistent with
12 matches
Mail list logo