On 03/26/19 at 04:43am, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:02:27PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
> > the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. Fix it.
>
> > static int
> > -memory_block_action(u
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:02:27PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
> the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. Fix it.
> static int
> -memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int
> onli
On Tue 26-03-19 17:02:27, Baoquan He wrote:
> The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
> the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. Fix it.
phys_index is a relict from the past and it indeed denotes the section
number which is exported as phys_index vi
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:02 AM Baoquan He wrote:
>
> The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
> the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
Reviewed-by: Rafae
4 matches
Mail list logo