On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:23:30PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> perf_event cgroup controller is one of the remaining few with broken
> hierarchy support. It turns out it's pretty easy to implement - the
> only thing necessary is making perf_cgroup_match() return %true also
> when the cgroup of the cu
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:37:55AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yeah - at least for larger changes that's a good workflow.
>
> For smaller changes we can pick one or the other tree. Tejun, do these
> changes
> create any conflicts with the current tip:master tree? If not then you could
>
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 19:23 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > perf_event cgroup controller is one of the remaining few with broken
> > hierarchy support. It turns out it's pretty easy to implement - the
> > only thing necessary is making perf_cgroup_match() return %true also
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 19:23 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> perf_event cgroup controller is one of the remaining few with broken
> hierarchy support. It turns out it's pretty easy to implement - the
> only thing necessary is making perf_cgroup_match() return %true also
> when the cgroup of the current t
On 2013/4/9 10:23, Tejun Heo wrote:
> perf_event cgroup controller is one of the remaining few with broken
> hierarchy support. It turns out it's pretty easy to implement - the
> only thing necessary is making perf_cgroup_match() return %true also
> when the cgroup of the current task is a descend
5 matches
Mail list logo
