Re: [RFC/PATCH 02/38] perf tools: Save mmap_param.len instead of mask

2015-10-12 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:03:33PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:17:11PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > It is more convenient saving mmap length rather than (bit) mask. With > > > this patch, w

Re: [RFC/PATCH 02/38] perf tools: Save mmap_param.len instead of mask

2015-10-08 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Jiri, On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:17:11PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > It is more convenient saving mmap length rather than (bit) mask. With > > this patch, we can eliminate dependency to perf_evlist other than > > getting mmap_desc

Re: [RFC/PATCH 02/38] perf tools: Save mmap_param.len instead of mask

2015-10-08 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > It is more convenient saving mmap length rather than (bit) mask. With > this patch, we can eliminate dependency to perf_evlist other than > getting mmap_desc for dealing with mmaps. The mask and length can be > converted using perf_e

Re: [RFC/PATCH 02/38] perf tools: Save mmap_param.len instead of mask

2015-10-06 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Arnaldo, On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 03:44:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > > It is more convenient saving mmap length rather than (bit) mask. With > > this patch, we can eliminate dependency to perf_evlist other than

Re: [RFC/PATCH 02/38] perf tools: Save mmap_param.len instead of mask

2015-10-02 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > It is more convenient saving mmap length rather than (bit) mask. With > this patch, we can eliminate dependency to perf_evlist other than > getting mmap_desc for dealing with mmaps. The mask and length can be > converted using per