Re: [RFC] another scheduler beater

2007-04-24 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 04:17, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The small attached script does a nice job of showing animation > > glitches in the glxgears animation. I have run one set of tests, and > > will have several more tomorrow. I'm off to a poker

Re: [RFC] another scheduler beater

2007-04-24 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The small attached script does a nice job of showing animation > glitches in the glxgears animation. I have run one set of tests, and > will have several more tomorrow. I'm off to a poker game, and would > like to let people draw their own conclusio

Re: [RFC] another scheduler beater

2007-04-23 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Based on just this script as load I would say renice on X isn't a good > thing. Based on one small test, I would say that renice of X in > conjunction with heavy disk i/o and a single fast scrolling xterm (think > kernel compile) seems t