On 23/08/2013 16:23, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 23/08/2013 14:13, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> On 08/23/13 13:39, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>>> On 23/08/2013 12:32, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 08/23/13 12:06, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 20/08/2013 04:04, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>
On 23/08/2013 14:13, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/23/13 13:39, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> On 23/08/2013 12:32, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>> On 08/23/13 12:06, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
On 20/08/2013 04:04, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from
On 08/23/13 13:39, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
On 23/08/2013 12:32, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 08/23/13 12:06, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
On 20/08/2013 04:04, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now
remove custom .init_time hooks.
As a fe
On 23/08/2013 12:32, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/23/13 12:06, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> On 20/08/2013 04:04, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>> With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now
>>> remove custom .init_time hooks.
>>
>> As a feared it won't work on Armada X
On 08/23/13 12:06, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
On 20/08/2013 04:04, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now
remove custom .init_time hooks.
As a feared it won't work on Armada XP. You moved coherency_init(), and
l2x0_of_init() in the init_ma
Hi Sebastian,
On 20/08/2013 04:04, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now
> remove custom .init_time hooks.
>
As a feared it won't work on Armada XP. You moved coherency_init(), and
l2x0_of_init() in the init_machine hook. However init
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 03:12:12PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > Maybe that's why I'm getting only the patches where I'm Cced?
>
> I try to keep Cc list as short as possible, so I only put Gregory as the
> maintainer of mach-mvebu on Cc.
>
Pff... you're right, I got this because my mv
On 08/20/13 14:50, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
I've only received a few patches of this series. I *think*
using "RFC" alone is not correct in LAKML and for some reason
you're required to use RFC/PATCH.
Ezequiel,
we already sorted out, why they got stuck on LAKML. It is because
of the missing PATCH
Hi Sebastian,
I've only received a few patches of this series. I *think*
using "RFC" alone is not correct in LAKML and for some reason
you're required to use RFC/PATCH.
Maybe that's why I'm getting only the patches where I'm Cced?
Could you please re-send this? The series looks promising and I'd
9 matches
Mail list logo
