On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 14:59 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Anshuman Khandual
> wrote:
> > On 05/27/2014 05:39 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> I have been looking at those patches and ran some tests.
> >> And I found a few issues so far.
> >>
> >> I am running:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
> On 06/02/2014 06:29 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Anshuman Khandual
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2014 05:39 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
I have been looking at those patches and ran some tests.
And I
On 06/02/2014 06:29 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Anshuman Khandual
> wrote:
>> On 05/27/2014 05:39 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>> I have been looking at those patches and ran some tests.
>>> And I found a few issues so far.
>>>
>>> I am running:
>>> $ perf recor
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 05:39 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> I have been looking at those patches and ran some tests.
>> And I found a few issues so far.
>>
>> I am running:
>> $ perf record -j any_ret -e cycles:u test_program
>> $ perf report -D
On 05/27/2014 05:39 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> I have been looking at those patches and ran some tests.
> And I found a few issues so far.
>
> I am running:
> $ perf record -j any_ret -e cycles:u test_program
> $ perf report -D
>
> Most entries are okay and match the filter, however some do no
Hi,
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
>
> This patchset is the re-spin of the original branch stack
> sampling
> patchset which introduced new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND branch filter. This
> patchset
> also enables SW based branch filtering support for boo
6 matches
Mail list logo
