* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:57:07AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:50:26AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:36:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > > So I checked my NHM box with your latest queue and it no
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:57:07AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:50:26AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:36:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > So I checked my NHM box with your latest queue and it now works
> > > correctly. Do you
> >
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:50:26AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:36:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > So I checked my NHM box with your latest queue and it now works correctly.
> > Do you
> > have any idea what the difference is/was?
>
> Sadly, no clue :/
>
> I w
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:36:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So I checked my NHM box with your latest queue and it now works correctly. Do
> you
> have any idea what the difference is/was?
Sadly, no clue :/
I went over those patches and cannot find anything that should affect
NHM (or <=SNB i
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > the symptom is that latest 'perf top' and 'perf record' produces no samples.
> >
> > So I've removed this commit and the related Skylake commit from -tip:
> >
> > 4576ceaa56a8 perf/x86: Use INST_RETI
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:02:58AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 07:48:41AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > Also, I'm not convinced we need a new 'ppp' qualifier f
Em Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 07:48:41AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Also, I'm not convinced we need a new 'ppp' qualifier for any of this,
> > > why not
> > > just replace 'pp' with this event - 'pp' is
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the symptom is that latest 'perf top' and 'perf record' produces no samples.
>
> So I've removed this commit and the related Skylake commit from -tip:
>
> 4576ceaa56a8 perf/x86: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles:ppp
> ac1e1d30c
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 07:48:41AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > Also, I'm not convinced we need a new 'ppp' qualifier for any of this,
> > > why not
> > > just replace 'pp' with this event - '
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Also, I'm not convinced we need a new 'ppp' qualifier for any of this, why
> > not
> > just replace 'pp' with this event - 'pp' is meant to be our most precise
> > event.
>
> I requested this because
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Also, I'm not convinced we need a new 'ppp' qualifier for any of this, why
> not
> just replace 'pp' with this event - 'pp' is meant to be our most precise
> event.
I requested this because the PREC_DIST events can only be scheduled
* tip-bot for Andi Kleen wrote:
> Commit-ID: 4576ceaa56a86bd0c041c204d51c3f3ca582a49c
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4576ceaa56a86bd0c041c204d51c3f3ca582a49c
> Author: Andi Kleen
> AuthorDate: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:28:09 -0800
> Committer: Ingo Molnar
> CommitDate: Fri, 4 Dec 2015
12 matches
Mail list logo
