Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> I got this one while compiling on NFS.
>>
>> C.
>>
>> kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480!
>
> I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are
> not, with rc4-mm
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> I got this one while compiling on NFS.
>
> C.
>
> kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480!
I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are
not, with rc4-mm1 there are two patches (first one
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:17:18AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Temporarily at
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
>
> Will appear later at
>
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
I got this one while compiling on NFS.
C.
kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this
change then
- certainly look
On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:09:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 11 December 2
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:21:41AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > From what i can roughly t
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change
>>> then
>>> - certainly looks networking related.
>> yep, but it
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100
>>
>>> On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over
to e1000e
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:11:23 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
> > > between acpi and
>
Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between
acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which res
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
> > between acpi and
> > the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_therm
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 21:17:01 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changes since 2.6.24-rc3-mm2:
2.6.24-rc4-mm1 brought a nice TCP oops on my x86_64 system, while I
was stress-testing the VM and watching via ssh:
general protection fault: [1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:29:18 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Dec 6 21:24:28 erratic-orbits init: tty3 main process (2991)
> > > terminated with status 1
> >
> > Boggle. We broke the vt driver?
> >
> > config, please...
>
> I sent the .config.
I didn't receive it but I found
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict
> between acpi and
> the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal code
> to read the wrong (0xff) temperature value and halt the machi
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:17:16 -0800 Kok, Auke wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800
> > "Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> > - Lots
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800
> "Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
> over
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800
"Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
> >>> over
> >>> to e1000e. So
Kok, Auke wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
over
to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
CONFIG_E1000E.
>>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
>>> over
>>> to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
>>> CONFIG_E1000E.
>>>
>>>
>> Wouldn't it
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:00:24PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > Hi L
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't see this compile failure posted anywhere:
> > http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126049/build/debug/stderr
> >
> > arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: Assembler messages:
> > arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S:23: Error: suffix or operands inval
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
> > over
> > to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
> > CONFIG_E1000E.
> >
> >
> Wouldn't it make sense to just de
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:44:43 am Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > > Hi Len,
> > >
> > > after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, o
I can't see this compile failure posted anywhere:
http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126049/build/debug/stderr
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S:23: Error: suffix or operands invalid
for `pop'
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/syscall.S:25: Error: suffix
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > Hi Len,
> >
> > after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
> > fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after clai
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:20:05 -0800 Martin Bligh wrote:
> >- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and
> > moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot
> > to set CONFIG_E1000E.
>
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was o
>- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and
> moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot
> to set CONFIG_E1000E.
Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was on?
As far as I can see that's not true, which will screwing everybody
On 11/12/2007 8:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100
Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/ker
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 16:08:00 -0800
> Or should this have been sys_nis_syscall()?
sys_nis_syscall() was used in cases on sparc where we wanted
to get a log of invocations of unimplemented syscalls, as it
aided debugging and anaylsis.
But the usefulness of
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100
Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> >
> > Will appear later at
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Dave, please include this one to net-2.6.25.
...
> --
> [PATCH] [TCP]: Fix fack_count miscountings (multiple places)
I've better version of this coming up, so Dave please don't put this one
into net-2.6.25 (noticed that both the original and the afte
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and move
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change
> > then
> > - certainly looks networking related.
>
> yep, but it isn't e1000. It's core
On Dec 8, 2007 6:22 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007 9:12 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
> > inline functions like this:
> > drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292:
2007/12/7, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
> inline functions like this:
> drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed
> in call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function body not available
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Hi Len,
>
> after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
> fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
> "Critical temperature reached (255 C)." However, the degrees numb
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:45:17 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:22:39 -0800
>
> > That's
> >
> > J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_jbddirty(bh));
> >
> > at the end of journal_unmap_buffer().
> >
> > I don't re
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:22:39 -0800
> That's
>
> J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_jbddirty(bh));
>
> at the end of journal_unmap_buffer().
>
> I don't recall seeing that before and I can't think of anything we've
> done recently which could cause it, sorr
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:02:54 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 02:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 0
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 02:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> > > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [cut]
> > > >
> > Dec 6 21:24:28 erratic-orbits init: tty3 main process (2991)
> > terminated with status 1
>
> Boggle. We broke the vt driver?
>
> config, please...
I sent the .config. Is there nothing else to follow up on? I have
tried rebuilding about seven kernels, tweaking the options each time.
All th
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:20:28 +0100 Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The box is sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64). This was caught when
> system (gentoo) was emerging some package.
>
> [27006.402237] kernel BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1894!
That's
J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_jb
Hello,
The box is sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64). This was caught when
system (gentoo) was emerging some package.
[27006.402237] kernel BUG at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1894!
[27006.402268] \|/ \|/
[27006.402274] "@'/ .. \`@"
[27006.402279] /_| \__/
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [cut]
> > > > > Now with MM kernels 2.6.24 rc1-4 the PCMCIA adapter works again, but
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `sys_call_table32':
> > arch/sparc64/kernel/head.S:(.text+0x224e0): undefined reference to
> > `compat_sys_timerfd'
> > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
> argh, sorry, I am soo fed up with fixing that patch.
>
> ---
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[cut]
> > > > Now with MM kernels 2.6.24 rc1-4 the PCMCIA adapter works again, but I
> > > > only get read rates of 1.6 MB/s. When it used to work in 2.6.20 I got
>
Zan Lynx wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I'm reporting p
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:26:43 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Today I noticed pgrep doesn't work. It seems the reason is a missing
>> Name: tag in the status file for a process in /proc.
>>
>> # cat /proc/1/status
>> init
>> State: S (
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 01:04:55 +0100
Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried it on sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64) station. Unfortunately it
> failed
> to compile.
>
> AS arch/sparc64/lib/xor.o
> AR arch/sparc64/lib/lib.a
> GEN .version
> CHK i
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:26:43 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I noticed pgrep doesn't work. It seems the reason is a missing
> Name: tag in the status file for a process in /proc.
>
> # cat /proc/1/status
> init
> State: S (sleeping)
> Tgid: 1
> Pid:1
> PPid: 0
> Tracer
Hello,
I tried it on sun ultra 60 (dual sparc64) station. Unfortunately it
failed
to compile.
AS arch/sparc64/lib/xor.o
AR arch/sparc64/lib/lib.a
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
dnsdomainname: Unknown host
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC ini
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
> > > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > W
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:05:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:45 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure if this problem has been addressed already. I read some
> > about the fast-fail issues and this may be related?
> >
> > On nearly all my U
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
> > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > While I'm reporting problems I'll get this one out there.
> > >
> > > I nor
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > While I'm reporting problems I'll get this one out there.
> >
> > I normally use a USB-2 memory card reader but I also have a PCMCIA
> > CompactFlash adapter t
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:45 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if this problem has been addressed already. I read some
> about the fast-fail issues and this may be related?
>
> On nearly all my USB block devices, I have been getting zillions of I/O
> errors. But they are
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I'm reporting problems I'll get this one out there.
>
> I normally use a USB-2 memory card reader but I also have a PCMCIA
> CompactFlash adapter that I use occasionally. During the MM series
> kernels 2.6.22 and 23 (
On Dec 6, 2007 9:12 PM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
> inline functions like this:
> drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed
> in call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function
> How about running 2.6.24-rc4 with _only_ the patch to this driver to
> convert it to krefs? Does that combination cause problems?
>
> The patch is at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver/kobject-convert-hvcs-to-use-kref-not-kobject.patch
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:28 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:44:29 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
>
> > > Anybody got any brilliant ideas? :)
> >
> > I guess it's nash again, which version is it?
>
> Confirmed - nash again. 6.0.9 does not work, upgrading to 6.0.19 works.
Oh,
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:44:29 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> > Anybody got any brilliant ideas? :)
>
> I guess it's nash again, which version is it?
Confirmed - nash again. 6.0.9 does not work, upgrading to 6.0.19 works.
init/Kconfig says this for SYSFS_DEPRECATED (which is where I got lead astray,
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 13:20 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:24:04 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> > >
> > > > What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:24:04 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> >
> > > What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to yes, if it isn't,
> > > and try again?
> >
> > I *knew* t
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100
>
> > On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
> > > over
> > > to e1000e. So if your e100
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:28:25 -0500
> "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How can I find Roland's patches, so I can try backing them out?
> > I looked in the broken out patches and only saw one related
> > to VDSO. Backing it out did not help
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:56:53 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The machine is: http://www.gateway.com/retail/mt6821.php
> Gnu C 4.2.3
> Gnu make 3.81
> binutils 2.18.20071027
> util-linux 2.13.1-rc1
> mount 2.1
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:32:26AM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:54:51PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:54:51PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
>> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incre
Hi,
2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some
inline functions like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:292: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in
call to 'ath5k_extend_tsf': function body not available
fix it with adjust the order of inline function body.
Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 00:28 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>
Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
This patch does not seem correct.
>>> Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
>>>
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:54:51PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is
> > > >> incremen
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > >> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
> > >> This patch does not seem correct.
> > >
> > > Doh, you are correct, I'll
I found:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119550978915647&w=2
through
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119551057816829&w=2
(I was unable to locate the 6th patch in the set)
When I tried backing out the patches, there were tons of errors. I
guess I'll punt on trying to build this MM tree. Sor
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:28:25 -0500
"Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I find Roland's patches, so I can try backing them out?
> I looked in the broken out patches and only saw one related
> to VDSO. Backing it out did not help. I tried searching for
> messages to LKML sent by "rola
How can I find Roland's patches, so I can try backing them out?
I looked in the broken out patches and only saw one related
to VDSO. Backing it out did not help. I tried searching for
messages to LKML sent by "roland" but mostly got a bunch of
folks sending spam.
Thanks,
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
>
> > What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to yes, if it isn't,
> > and try again?
>
> I *knew* there was a D'Oh! error in here. ;)
>
> Bisection is fast closing in
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:12 +0100, Kay Sievers said:
> What's the value of SYSFS_DEPRECATED? Care to set it to yes, if it isn't,
> and try again?
I *knew* there was a D'Oh! error in here. ;)
Bisection is fast closing in on gregkh-driver-block-device.patch, which broke
my LVM almost the exact sa
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:28:38 +0100
Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 05.12.2007 06:17, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > Temporarily at
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> > Will appear later at
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.
Le 05.12.2007 06:17, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> Temporarily at
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> Will appear later at
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
LDS arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/vdso32.lds
AS arch/x86/vdso
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:04:12PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> A fix for LVM to handle symlinks instead of directories is in the LVM
> CVS tree, but there wasn't a release since August.
I released it yesterday:-)
Alasdair
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
On Dec 6, 2007 8:38 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:18:08PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:04:20 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:28:58AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> >> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
> >> This patch does not seem correct.
> >
> > Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
> > it.
> >
> > th
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:38:43 PST, Greg KH said:
> > Would I be remiss in hypothesising that something in gregkh-driver-kobject-*
> > changed something, and now we need a agk-dm-dm-kobject-fixupage.patch?
>
> I don't know, it all depends on what is in the dm patches. Hopefully
> everything that I
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:49:59PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
> >
> > CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
> > drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
> > drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wro
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:18:08PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:04:20 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> > >
> > > Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:52:29AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> git-scsi-misc.patch
> >
> > Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
> > http://marc.info/?t=11962802235&r=1&w=2
> > "2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_reques
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 00:28 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> >> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
> >> This patch does not seem correct.
> >
> > Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
> > it.
> >
> > thanks,
>
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:04:20 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> >
> > Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked fine for
> > quite some time suddenly couldn't mount /dev/VolGroup0
Greg KH wrote:
>> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
>> This patch does not seem correct.
>
> Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
> it.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, Greg,
I ran some tests with the fixed up version of th
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:49:59PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
>>>
>>> CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
>>> drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
>>> drivers/char/hvcs.c:
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
>
> CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
> drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
> drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark
> make[2]: *** [drivers/char/hvcs.o
On Thu, Dec 06 2007, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> git-scsi-misc.patch
> >
> > Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
> > http://marc.info/?t=11962802235&r=1&w=2
> > "2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request: I/O
> > error"
>
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:49:24 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:17:01 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
>
> Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked fine for
> qu
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:17:01 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Something in here broke LVM support - an initrd that has worked fine for
quite some time suddenly couldn't mount /dev/VolGroup00/root so we get the
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> git-scsi-misc.patch
>
> Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
> http://marc.info/?t=11962802235&r=1&w=2
> "2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request: I/O
> error"
> for previous installment.
>
> I've bisected it to the fol
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
> >
> > Will appear later at
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/p
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:45:37 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails on s390x,
>
> CC arch/s390/kernel/traps.o
> In file included from include/asm/thread_info.h:39,
> from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
>
From: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100
> On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over
> > to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set
> > CONFIG_E1000E.
>
>
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/
- Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
