On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:01:49 +0100
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How embarassing, sorry about that! Pierre, shall I shove this upstream
> or will you?
>
Sorry about being out touch. My day job is killing me... :/
I see you managed to sort things out by yourselves though. :)
Rgds
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:01:49 +0100
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How embarassing, sorry about that! Pierre, shall I shove this upstream
or will you?
Sorry about being out touch. My day job is killing me... :/
I see you managed to sort things out by yourselves though. :)
Rgds
--
On Thu, Nov 08 2007, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Tested-by: Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks for testing! Pierre / Jens, please merge with Romano's
> tested-by line.
I already did, earlier today:
> Tested-by: Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for testing! Pierre / Jens, please merge with Romano's
tested-by line.
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:37 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> .
>
> Pierre, assuming Romano tests this patch successfully, please apply!
>
Hi, the patch below solves the problem with my SD card.
Tested-by: Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks!
Romano
> <-- patch below -->
>
>
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:37 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
.
Pierre, assuming Romano tests this patch successfully, please apply!
Hi, the patch below solves the problem with my SD card.
Tested-by: Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
Romano
-- patch below --
mmc: Fix sg
Tested-by: Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for testing! Pierre / Jens, please merge with Romano's
tested-by line.
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Thu, Nov 08 2007, Roland Dreier wrote:
Tested-by: Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for testing! Pierre / Jens, please merge with Romano's
tested-by line.
I already did, earlier today:
On Wed, Nov 07 2007, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD
> > problem. The method I used was to insert the card, umount it, and make 8 dd
> > in a row; the kernel is "bad" if they differs, "good" if they are the
> same.
> >
> > I
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:37:46 -0800
Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> mmc: Fix sg helper copy-and-paste error
>
> Commit 45711f1a ("[SG] Update drivers to use sg helpers") had the
> following bogus change in drivers/mmc/card/queue.c:
>
> > - src_buf =
On Wednesday, 7 of November 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 23:17 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> > Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect...
>
> Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD
> problem. The method I used
> Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD
> problem. The method I used was to insert the card, umount it, and make 8 dd
> in a row; the kernel is "bad" if they differs, "good" if they are the same.
>
> I could not finish the bisect. The last pair good/bad
Romano Giannetti wrote:
Hi,
I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1
eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot
and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems so far.
This morning I put the card in, nothing
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 23:17 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect...
Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD
problem. The method I used was to insert the card, umount it, and make 8 dd
in a row; the kernel
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 23:17 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect...
Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD
problem. The method I used was to insert the card, umount it, and make 8 dd
in a row; the kernel
Romano Giannetti wrote:
Hi,
I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1
eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot
and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems so far.
This morning I put the card in, nothing
Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD
problem. The method I used was to insert the card, umount it, and make 8 dd
in a row; the kernel is bad if they differs, good if they are the same.
I could not finish the bisect. The last pair good/bad were:
On Wednesday, 7 of November 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 23:17 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect...
Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD
problem. The method I used was to
On Wed, Nov 07 2007, Roland Dreier wrote:
Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD
problem. The method I used was to insert the card, umount it, and make 8 dd
in a row; the kernel is bad if they differs, good if they are the
same.
I could not finish
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:37:46 -0800
Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mmc: Fix sg helper copy-and-paste error
Commit 45711f1a ([SG] Update drivers to use sg helpers) had the
following bogus change in drivers/mmc/card/queue.c:
- src_buf =
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:17:39PM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:48 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
>
> > I do really suspect a software bug.
> >
>
> Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect...
>
> Romano
>
> BTW: I noticed that if I
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:48 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> I do really suspect a software bug.
>
Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect...
Romano
BTW: I noticed that if I change EXTRAVERSION, doing a make rebuild
almost all the kernel. Is it normal? And it
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> (first time)
> > 000 31e4 c363 d908 cb2e
>
> (fourth time)
> > 000 71e4 c36f d908 cb2e
>
> (fifth time)
> > 000
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> It looks like a hardware problem to me. Maybe one version is more
> optimized and puts more stress on the device ? I remember having
> had comparable problems in the past with a CF connected to a
> home-made IDE adapter on which the +5V
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
(first time)
> 000 31e4 c363 d908 cb2e
(fourth time)
> 000 71e4 c36f d908 cb2e
(fifth time)
> 000 f1e4 c37b d908 cb2e
Most always, you have only a few bits
(Nick re-added to the Cc: list; sorry, I dropped you without noticing)
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 10:58 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is
> busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six times in a
> row,
Hi,
I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is
busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six times in a
row, and look:
(0)rukbat:~/software/toshiba/lk2624-rc1-mmc2% sudo dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 bs=1c
count=128 | od -h
128+0 records in
128+0 records out
Hi,
I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is
busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six times in a
row, and look:
(0)rukbat:~/software/toshiba/lk2624-rc1-mmc2% sudo dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 bs=1c
count=128 | od -h
128+0 records in
128+0 records out
(Nick re-added to the Cc: list; sorry, I dropped you without noticing)
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 10:58 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
Hi,
I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is
busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six times in a
row, and
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
(first time)
000 31e4 c363 d908 cb2e
(fourth time)
000 71e4 c36f d908 cb2e
(fifth time)
000 f1e4 c37b d908 cb2e
Most always, you have only a few bits
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
(first time)
000 31e4 c363 d908 cb2e
(fourth time)
000 71e4 c36f d908 cb2e
(fifth time)
000 f1e4
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:48 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
I do really suspect a software bug.
Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect...
Romano
BTW: I noticed that if I change EXTRAVERSION, doing a make rebuild
almost all the kernel. Is it normal? And it
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
It looks like a hardware problem to me. Maybe one version is more
optimized and puts more stress on the device ? I remember having
had comparable problems in the past with a CF connected to a
home-made IDE adapter on which the +5V wire
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:17:39PM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:48 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
I do really suspect a software bug.
Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect...
Romano
BTW: I noticed that if I change
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:26 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:46:33 +0100
> Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > > Did you partition and format this card in the camera or in Linux?
> >
> > In the
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:46:33 +0100
Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > Did you partition and format this card in the camera or in Linux?
>
> In the camera. It happened both with a Kodak and a Panasonic Lumix.
>
Does it
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:51:45 +0100
Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100
> > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ah, I forgot: I have a dump of the card (made with dd). If you'd
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100
> Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, I forgot: I have a dump of the card (made with dd). If you'd happen
to need it, simply tell me. dd gave no errors.
And to double check, I mounted a
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100
> >
>
> Ok, now this is a bit more telling. The filesystem is indeed corrupt
> somehow as it references sectors wy outside the device (at roughly
> 280 MB).
Yes. The problem is, when I firstly
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100
Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> and opening the folder in Nautilus:
>
> Nov 5 09:21:43 rukbat kernel: [ 1654.235333] FAT: Filesystem panic (dev
> mmcblk0p1)
> Nov 5 09:21:43 rukbat kernel: [ 1654.235893] FAT: Filesystem panic (dev
>
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 08:11 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> I had something similar recently, trying to access an SD card in the
> internal drive of my thinkpad X60. Fortunately, the data wasn't
> actually corrupted, but when I tried to copy the picture files off the
> card, I saw garbage
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 08:11 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
I had something similar recently, trying to access an SD card in the
internal drive of my thinkpad X60. Fortunately, the data wasn't
actually corrupted, but when I tried to copy the picture files off the
card, I saw garbage filenames in
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100
Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and opening the folder in Nautilus:
Nov 5 09:21:43 rukbat kernel: [ 1654.235333] FAT: Filesystem panic (dev
mmcblk0p1)
Nov 5 09:21:43 rukbat kernel: [ 1654.235893] FAT: Filesystem panic (dev
mmcblk0p1)
Nov
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100
Ok, now this is a bit more telling. The filesystem is indeed corrupt
somehow as it references sectors wy outside the device (at roughly
280 MB).
Yes. The problem is, when I firstly mounted it
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100
Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, I forgot: I have a dump of the card (made with dd). If you'd happen
to need it, simply tell me. dd gave no errors.
And to double check, I mounted a VFAT
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:51:45 +0100
Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100
Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, I forgot: I have a dump of the card (made with dd). If you'd happen
to
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:46:33 +0100
Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Did you partition and format this card in the camera or in Linux?
In the camera. It happened both with a Kodak and a Panasonic Lumix.
Does it work if
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:26 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:46:33 +0100
Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Did you partition and format this card in the camera or in Linux?
In the camera. It
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 08:11:10 -0800
Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I put the same card back in the camera and used the camera's dock
> to access the data via USB mass storage, everything worked fine. So
> it does seem to be at least somewhat MMC-related.
>
Since there was no
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:29:43 +0100
Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you reproduce this? To help you I need to see the errors given by
> > the MMC layer. You should also try reproducing it without a tainted
> > kernel (i.e. don't load ndiswrapper).
>
> I have a spare 128M card
I had something similar recently, trying to access an SD card in the
internal drive of my thinkpad X60. Fortunately, the data wasn't
actually corrupted, but when I tried to copy the picture files off the
card, I saw garbage filenames in the picture directory, and I saw this
in the kernel log:
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 18:28 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:56:42 +0100
> Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Data loss is never fun. I hope you didn't have anything important on the card.
>
Well. A cousin-in-law marriage, would have been best not to lose it,
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 18:28 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:56:42 +0100
Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Data loss is never fun. I hope you didn't have anything important on the card.
Well. A cousin-in-law marriage, would have been best not to lose it, but
I'll
I had something similar recently, trying to access an SD card in the
internal drive of my thinkpad X60. Fortunately, the data wasn't
actually corrupted, but when I tried to copy the picture files off the
card, I saw garbage filenames in the picture directory, and I saw this
in the kernel log:
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:29:43 +0100
Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you reproduce this? To help you I need to see the errors given by
the MMC layer. You should also try reproducing it without a tainted
kernel (i.e. don't load ndiswrapper).
I have a spare 128M card I can use
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 08:11:10 -0800
Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I put the same card back in the camera and used the camera's dock
to access the data via USB mass storage, everything worked fine. So
it does seem to be at least somewhat MMC-related.
Since there was no error
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:17:42 -0400
Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I always flip the write-protect switch when I use mine with a computer,
> and only let the camera write to the card.
Just so noone gets any optimistic ideas, that switch is software enforced so
it's no guarantee
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:56:42 +0100
Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1
> eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot
> and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:56:42 +0100
Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1
eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot
and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:17:42 -0400
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always flip the write-protect switch when I use mine with a computer,
and only let the camera write to the card.
Just so noone gets any optimistic ideas, that switch is software enforced so
it's no guarantee against
On 11/01/2007 07:56 AM, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1
> eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot
> and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems so far.
> This morning I
On Thursday 01 November 2007 22:56, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1
> eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot
> and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems so far.
> This
On Thursday 01 November 2007 22:56, Romano Giannetti wrote:
Hi,
I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1
eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot
and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems so far.
This
On 11/01/2007 07:56 AM, Romano Giannetti wrote:
Hi,
I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1
eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot
and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems so far.
This morning I put the
64 matches
Mail list logo
