On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
>> In other words, erase the word "Red Hat" from my question, and
>> restate it "what version of nfs-utils is needed by 2.4.0test9"?
>>
>> Then I can compare with what I have regardless of dist.
>
>Look into linux/Documentation/Changes.
>Oh, it fails to
> " " == Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell
> about the NFS stuff.
o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v
The only thing missing is the nfs-utils version: the rule there is
'all versions
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:22:48AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> >Ask RedHat.
>
> I'm _not_ using a Red Hat kernel. That is why I posted here,
> because Red Hat will tell me that I'm not using their
> kernel. People here know wether or not it needs
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:22:48AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
Ask RedHat.
I'm _not_ using a Red Hat kernel. That is why I posted here,
because Red Hat will tell me that I'm not using their
kernel. People here know wether or not it needs to be
" " == Kurt Garloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell
about the NFS stuff.
o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v
The only thing missing is the nfs-utils version: the rule there is
'all versions work but
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
In other words, erase the word "Red Hat" from my question, and
restate it "what version of nfs-utils is needed by 2.4.0test9"?
Then I can compare with what I have regardless of dist.
Look into linux/Documentation/Changes.
Oh, it fails to tell about
6 matches
Mail list logo