Re: NFS in 2.4.x

2000-10-17 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote: >> In other words, erase the word "Red Hat" from my question, and >> restate it "what version of nfs-utils is needed by 2.4.0test9"? >> >> Then I can compare with what I have regardless of dist. > >Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. >Oh, it fails to

Re: NFS in 2.4.x

2000-10-17 Thread Trond Myklebust
> " " == Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell > about the NFS stuff. o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v The only thing missing is the nfs-utils version: the rule there is 'all versions

Re: NFS in 2.4.x

2000-10-17 Thread Kurt Garloff
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:22:48AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote: > >Ask RedHat. > > I'm _not_ using a Red Hat kernel. That is why I posted here, > because Red Hat will tell me that I'm not using their > kernel. People here know wether or not it needs

Re: NFS in 2.4.x

2000-10-17 Thread Kurt Garloff
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:22:48AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote: Ask RedHat. I'm _not_ using a Red Hat kernel. That is why I posted here, because Red Hat will tell me that I'm not using their kernel. People here know wether or not it needs to be

Re: NFS in 2.4.x

2000-10-17 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Kurt Garloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell about the NFS stuff. o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v The only thing missing is the nfs-utils version: the rule there is 'all versions work but

Re: NFS in 2.4.x

2000-10-17 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote: In other words, erase the word "Red Hat" from my question, and restate it "what version of nfs-utils is needed by 2.4.0test9"? Then I can compare with what I have regardless of dist. Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell about