On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:50:35 +0100, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1# ls
> > > ./ ../ device@
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1# ls -l
> > > Segmentation fault
> >
> > What device is that, and which driver is handling
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 21:52 +, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:45:32PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 21:07 +, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:53:42PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 07:38 +, Russell King w
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:45:32PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 21:07 +, Russell King wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:53:42PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 07:38 +, Russell King wrote:
> > > > Users need to be re-educated _not_ to use ksymoop
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 21:07 +, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:53:42PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 07:38 +, Russell King wrote:
> > > Users need to be re-educated _not_ to use ksymoops.
> >
> > How about changing the fscking docs to not tell users to
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:53:42PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 07:38 +, Russell King wrote:
> > Users need to be re-educated _not_ to use ksymoops.
>
> How about changing the fscking docs to not tell users to use it?
Would be useful. The "fscking" problem is that no one
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 07:38 +, Russell King wrote:
> Users need to be re-educated _not_ to use ksymoops.
>
How about changing the fscking docs to not tell users to use it?
Seems like lots of stuff in Documentation/ is stuck in 2.4 land. How
about purging it? Incorrect docs are worse than n
Hi Andrew, Miles,
> > Andrew, this command causes the Oops for me:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1# ls
> > ./ ../ device@
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1# ls -l
> > Segmentation fault
>
> What device is that, and which driver is handling it?
If I am a
Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ahem. In this case, I think it was operator error. I reproduced the
> problem and have included the entire output of ksymoops below.
Please don't use ksymoops. 2.6 kernels decode oopses internally and
ksymoops actually removes a little info.
> Andrew,
Ahem. In this case, I think it was operator error. I reproduced the
problem and have included the entire output of ksymoops below.
Andrew, this command causes the Oops for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1# ls
./ ../ device@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1# ls
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 07:50:32AM +, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:45:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:22:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Un
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:45:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:22:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 24fc1024
> > > >
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:22:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 24fc1024
> > > c0198448
> > > *pde =
> > > Oops: [#1]
> > > CPU:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:22:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 24fc1024
> > c0198448
> > *pde =
> > Oops: [#1]
> > CPU:0
> > EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI
>
> I wonder
Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/class/i2c-adapter# ls * -l
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys# cat */*/*/*
>
> ksymoops 2.4.9 on i686 2.6.12-rc1-mm2. Options used
> -o /lib/modules/2.6.12-rc1-mm2 (specified)
> -m /boot/System.map-2.6.12-rc1-mm2 (specified)
>
14 matches
Mail list logo