On 2016-06-30 05:30, Wim Osterholt wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:34:14AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
I posted this [PATCH V2 0/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct ISA penalty
calculation
Can you test this and give me a tested-by?
Kernel-4.7-rc5 plus this patch works like a charm on my Inspiron 41
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:34:14AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >
>
> I posted this [PATCH V2 0/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct ISA penalty calculation
>
> Can you test this and give me a tested-by?
Kernel-4.7-rc5 plus this patch works like a charm on my Inspiron 4100.
Dmesg output is quite similar to
On 6/27/2016 5:05 PM, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2016-06-27 16:04, Wim Osterholt wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:22:18AM -0400, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>> > However, an earlier try on my Inspiron 510m did not work.
>>> > I'll do a clean retry later today, just to make sure.
>>>
>>>
On 2016-06-27 16:04, Wim Osterholt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:22:18AM -0400, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> However, an earlier try on my Inspiron 510m did not work.
> I'll do a clean retry later today, just to make sure.
Ok, let me know. I can post a clean patch series. I was trying to
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:22:18AM -0400, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > However, an earlier try on my Inspiron 510m did not work.
> > I'll do a clean retry later today, just to make sure.
>
>
> Ok, let me know. I can post a clean patch series. I was trying to get
> you something to test before
On 2016-06-27 02:27, Wim Osterholt wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 04:51:03AM -0400, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2016-06-24 21:39, Wim Osterholt wrote:
Please apply the patches on top of clean 4.7-rc4 tree and apply them
in
order with
git am 0001...
git am 0002...
It doesn't work that wa
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 04:51:03AM -0400, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2016-06-24 21:39, Wim Osterholt wrote:
>
> Please apply the patches on top of clean 4.7-rc4 tree and apply them in
> order with
>
> git am 0001...
> git am 0002...
It doesn't work that way.
Beginners problems with git.
T
On 2016-06-24 21:39, Wim Osterholt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:09:15AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
Can you give it a try?
Whell, I tried to no avail.
Wether it is on 4.6 or 4.7, with or without your previous patch,
I keep getting rejected hunks.
For example, here the line to be deleted is
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:09:15AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
> Can you give it a try?
Whell, I tried to no avail.
Wether it is on 4.6 or 4.7, with or without your previous patch,
I keep getting rejected hunks.
For example, here the line to be deleted is nowhere to be found:
> diff --git a/driv
On 6/23/2016 7:25 PM, Wim Osterholt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:45:47AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure, let me get a patch for you.
>>
>> Here it is
>
> http://webserver.djo.tudelft.nl/dmesg460+printpatch2
>
Thanks, this was very helpful. I was able to fix the problem by using
the
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:45:47AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >
> > Sure, let me get a patch for you.
>
> Here it is
http://webserver.djo.tudelft.nl/dmesg460+printpatch2
> I am trying to find a system with similar characteristics for debug
All from the same laptop, Dell Inspiron 4100.
The sam
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:21:58 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Alex, FYI]
>
> This thread is about a regression that we'll want to fix before v4.7
> releases. It looks like it's related to these changes which were
> merged via the ACPI tree:
>
> 9e5ed6d1fb87 ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize
[+cc Alex, FYI]
This thread is about a regression that we'll want to fix before v4.7
releases. It looks like it's related to these changes which were
merged via the ACPI tree:
9e5ed6d1fb87 ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function
1fcb6a813c4f ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove redundant code in acpi_irq
On 6/23/2016 10:55 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 6/23/2016 10:12 AM, Wim Osterholt wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:54:39PM -0400, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>> On 2016-06-21 18:13, Wim Osterholt wrote:
>
> pr_info("%s:%d irq = %d penalty = %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, irq,
>
On 6/23/2016 10:12 AM, Wim Osterholt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:54:39PM -0400, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2016-06-21 18:13, Wim Osterholt wrote:
pr_info("%s:%d irq = %d penalty = %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, irq,
penalty);
>>>
>>> This produced some 6
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:54:39PM -0400, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2016-06-21 18:13, Wim Osterholt wrote:
> >>
> >>pr_info("%s:%d irq = %d penalty = %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, irq,
> >>penalty);
> >>
> >
> > This produced some 60 lines extra
>
> Thanks, let's go back
On 2016-06-21 18:13, Wim Osterholt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:40:10AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
Thanks, It was a guess with no proof.
Let's undo the change above and start adding some print statements to
collect
data from your system.
Can you add this to the end of acpi_irq_get_penalt
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:40:10AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
> Thanks, It was a guess with no proof.
>
> Let's undo the change above and start adding some print statements to collect
> data from your system.
>
> Can you add this to the end of acpi_irq_get_penalty function and then send
> the ou
On 6/21/2016 8:47 AM, Wim Osterholt wrote:
>> Can you try the following and see if it makes any difference?
>>
>>
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
>> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
>> int penalty = 0;
>>
>> if (irq < ACP
> Can you try the following and see if it makes any difference?
>
>
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> int penalty = 0;
>
> if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> - penalty += acpi
On 6/20/2016 5:25 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Sinan]
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:02:57AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> You should CC the linux-pci too (done now)
>>
>> On Monday, June 20, 2016 02:35:30 AM Wim Osterholt wrote:
>>> L.S.
>>> up to vanilla kernel-4.6.2 sound was working fi
[+cc Sinan]
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:02:57AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> You should CC the linux-pci too (done now)
>
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 02:35:30 AM Wim Osterholt wrote:
> > L.S.
> > up to vanilla kernel-4.6.2 sound was working fine.
> > Switching to kernel-4.7.0-rc3 made sound di
You should CC the linux-pci too (done now)
On Monday, June 20, 2016 02:35:30 AM Wim Osterholt wrote:
> L.S.
> up to vanilla kernel-4.6.2 sound was working fine.
> Switching to kernel-4.7.0-rc3 made sound disappear. No /dev/mixer etc.
> There appears to be a bug in the Intel sound driver and/or ACP
23 matches
Mail list logo
