Martin J. Bligh wrote:
--Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Saturday, February 19, 2005
11:30:53 -0500):
Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
You are right. Kernel balancer doesn't move around the irqs, unless it
has too many interrupts. The logic is moving around interrupts all the
time will not b
> I've noticed this problem for a while, but only now decided to ask.
> Interrupt balancing doesn't do anything on my system.
>
>CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 31931808 0IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 76595 0IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 8: 1 0IO-AP
--Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Saturday, February 19, 2005
11:30:53 -0500):
> Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
>> You are right. Kernel balancer doesn't move around the irqs, unless it
>> has too many interrupts. The logic is moving around interrupts all the
>> time will not be good on ca
Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
You are right. Kernel balancer doesn't move around the irqs, unless it
has too many interrupts. The logic is moving around interrupts all the
time will not be good on caches. So, there is a threshold above which
the balancer start moving things around.
You should see the
ou do 'ping -f' or a big 'dd' from
the disk.
Thanks,
Venki
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel
>Cunningham
>Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 1:02 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Linux Kerne
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 21:58 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> Didn't realise it was going to take nothing to install, so I've done it.
> IRQs are running on cpu 1 now. Is there some documentation somewhere?
> I'm wondering whether I can compile kirqd out.
with irqbalance running yes
Hi again.
Didn't realise it was going to take nothing to install, so I've done it.
IRQs are running on cpu 1 now. Is there some documentation somewhere?
I'm wondering whether I can compile kirqd out.
Thanks and regards,
Nigel
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 20:36, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-0
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 20:36, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 20:07 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi Jeff.
> >
> > On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 17:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > What are the results of running irqbalanced?
> >
> > You mean the debuggi
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 20:02 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 17:44, Kwijibo wrote:
> > My guess is that irqbalance is not running.
>
> No. It is.
>
> USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
> root 301 0.0 0.0 00 ?
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 20:07 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Jeff.
>
> On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 17:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > What are the results of running irqbalanced?
>
> You mean the debugging output? I can reenable it and record the results
> if that's what you m
Hi Jeff.
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 17:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> What are the results of running irqbalanced?
You mean the debugging output? I can reenable it and record the results
if that's what you mean.
>From memory though, it got to not_worth_the_effort via this code:
Hi.
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 17:44, Kwijibo wrote:
> My guess is that irqbalance is not running.
No. It is.
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 301 0.0 0.0 00 ?SW 16:52 0:00 [kirqd]
The debugging info reports that it doesn't think
Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi all.
I've noticed this problem for a while, but only now decided to ask.
Interrupt balancing doesn't do anything on my system.
CPU0 CPU1
0: 31931808 0IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 76595 0IO-APIC-edge i8042
8: 1
My guess is that irqbalance is not running.
Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi all.
I've noticed this problem for a while, but only now decided to ask.
Interrupt balancing doesn't do anything on my system.
CPU0 CPU1
0: 31931808 0IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 76595 0
Hi all.
I've noticed this problem for a while, but only now decided to ask.
Interrupt balancing doesn't do anything on my system.
CPU0 CPU1
0: 31931808 0IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 76595 0IO-APIC-edge i8042
8: 1 0IO-APIC-ed
15 matches
Mail list logo
