On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:37:21AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Yes, this is expected behaviour with -ac14, -pre3 and newer.
>
> If that means anything that doesn't happen here based on pre3.
It doesn't happen here either. Even with (ever so slig
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 05:35:54PM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:41:02PM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> > > > so, if there is another way to get that info
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:44:29PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:54:09AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > YOUR PATCH fixes a real bug, true. But that wasn't
> > > what German was complaining about ;)
> >
> > How did you kn
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:54:09AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > YOUR PATCH fixes a real bug, true. But that wasn't
> > what German was complaining about ;)
>
> How did you know that before he made his first reply to my email?
Because he started th
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:54:09AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> YOUR PATCH fixes a real bug, true. But that wasn't
> what German was complaining about ;)
How did you know that before he made his first reply to my email?
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ke
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > which is now a lot closer to being balanced. It's not a bug,
>
> wrong, that was a core showstopper bug and it renders any
> machine with a zone empty unusable. (it has nothing to do with
> beauty or stats)
YOUR PATCH fixes a real bug, true. But
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:43:14AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > either apply this patch to 2.4.5ac15:
> >
> >
>ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.5aa3/00_fix-unusable-vm-on-alpha-1
>
> That one has alre
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:37:21AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Yes, this is expected behaviour with -ac14, -pre3 and newer.
If that means anything that doesn't happen here based on pre3.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 03:34:43PM +0200, Luigi Genoni wrote:
> Maybe there could be some HW related reason because of which it fixed for
yes, most probably he didn't had any zone empty so the fix couldn't make
a difference for him. German, can you confirm? (if you don't know what
it means just s
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> either apply this patch to 2.4.5ac15:
>
>
>ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.5aa3/00_fix-unusable-vm-on-alpha-1
That one has already been fixed in -pre3 and I think also
in -ac14+ kernels (haven't verifi
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> I've running 2.4.5-ac15 for almost a day (22 hours) and I found
> some strange behaviour of the kswap, at least it was not present in
> 2.4.5-ac9. The swap memory increase with time as the cache dedicated
> memory also increase, that is swap
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:14:01PM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've running 2.4.5-ac15 for almost a day (22 hours) and I found
> > > some strange behaviour of
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:14:01PM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've running 2.4.5-ac15 for almost a day (22 hours) and I found
> > some strange behaviour of the kswap, at least it was not present in
> > 2.4.5-ac9. The
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:14:01PM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've running 2.4.5-ac15 for almost a day (22 hours) and I found
> some strange behaviour of the kswap, at least it was not present in
> 2.4.5-ac9. The swap memory increase with time as the cache dedicate
Hello,
I've running 2.4.5-ac15 for almost a day (22 hours) and I found
some strange behaviour of the kswap, at least it was not present in
2.4.5-ac9. The swap memory increase with time as the cache dedicated
memory also increase, that is swapping process at a very fast rate, even
15 matches
Mail list logo
