Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>How close is TCP_NOPUSH to behaving identically to TCP_CORK now?
They are exactly the same.
>If it does behave identically, it might be time to standardize
>the symbolic name for this option, to make apps more portable
>between the two OS's. (It'd be nice
Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>Without proper uncorking (and it really shouldn't be that hard to
> >>add), TCP_NOPUSH simply can't be used in the generic sense.
> >
> >It was easy :-) I've put up a patch for FreeBS
2 matches
Mail list logo
