Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >How close is TCP_NOPUSH to behaving identically to TCP_CORK now? They are exactly the same. >If it does behave identically, it might be time to standardize >the symbolic name for this option, to make apps more portable >between the two OS's. (It'd be nice to also standardize the >numeric value, in the interest of making the ABI's more compatible, too.) I wonder if it's a bit late for that now... This reminds me to make sure that FreeBSD's Linux emulation supports TCP_CORK properly. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] " ``Well, let's go down and find out who's grave it is.'' ``How?'' ``By going down and finding out!'' " - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
