On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:12:55 +1000, Roger Luethi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
#define APC_BPORT_REG 0x30
#define APC_REGMASK0x01
-define APC_BPMASK 0x03
+#define APC_BPMASK 0x03
Color me skeptical. I've seen some weird bit flips and
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
> #define APC_BPORT_REG 0x30
>
> #define APC_REGMASK0x01
> -define APC_BPMASK 0x03
> +#define APC_BPMASK 0x03
Color me skeptical. I've seen some weird bit flips and data corruption;
"paramters" to "paramEters" I could buy. But data
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:43:31 +1000, Grant Coady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
Problem was dataloss on extracting kernel source, sometimes only
one character changed. Details on
http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/test/boxen/sempro/
Not the NIC, not reiserfs, not the kernel config, not even
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:43:31 +1000, Grant Coady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
Problem was dataloss on extracting kernel source, sometimes only
one character changed. Details on
http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/test/boxen/sempro/
Not the NIC, not reiserfs, not the kernel config, not even
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
#define APC_BPORT_REG 0x30
#define APC_REGMASK0x01
-define APC_BPMASK 0x03
+#define APC_BPMASK 0x03
Color me skeptical. I've seen some weird bit flips and data corruption;
paramters to paramEters I could buy. But data corruption
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:12:55 +1000, Roger Luethi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
#define APC_BPORT_REG 0x30
#define APC_REGMASK0x01
-define APC_BPMASK 0x03
+#define APC_BPMASK 0x03
Color me skeptical. I've seen some weird bit flips and data
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:21:30 +1000, Masoud Sharbiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you turn on UDP checksums and try again? That would isolate the
fault between the network or SATA.
It is the second tarball extraction from cache that suffers data
corruption, not a network error. I am in
Can you turn on UDP checksums and try again? That would isolate the
fault between the network or SATA.
cheers,
Masoud
Grant Coady wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:43:42 +0400, "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How to test and isolate this error is in NIC driver, SATA driver or
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:43:42 +0400, "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> How to test and isolate this error is in NIC driver, SATA driver or
>> filesystem?
>>
>
>Could it be that tarbal on NFS server changed?
>It is not very likely that error in kernel drivers fixed typos in
Hello
Grant Coady wrote:
Greetings,
Situation is dataloss with no errors logged.
Test: unpack 2.6.12 tarball from NFS mount source, diff against
previous attempt:
$ diff -Nrup linux-2.6.12.old linux-2.6.12
Binary files linux-2.6.12.old/include/asm-sparc/a.out.h and
Hello
Grant Coady wrote:
Greetings,
Situation is dataloss with no errors logged.
Test: unpack 2.6.12 tarball from NFS mount source, diff against
previous attempt:
$ diff -Nrup linux-2.6.12.old linux-2.6.12
Binary files linux-2.6.12.old/include/asm-sparc/a.out.h and
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:43:42 +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How to test and isolate this error is in NIC driver, SATA driver or
filesystem?
Could it be that tarbal on NFS server changed?
It is not very likely that error in kernel drivers fixed typos in source code.
Can you turn on UDP checksums and try again? That would isolate the
fault between the network or SATA.
cheers,
Masoud
Grant Coady wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:43:42 +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How to test and isolate this error is in NIC driver, SATA driver or
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:21:30 +1000, Masoud Sharbiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you turn on UDP checksums and try again? That would isolate the
fault between the network or SATA.
It is the second tarball extraction from cache that suffers data
corruption, not a network error. I am in
Greetings,
Situation is dataloss with no errors logged.
Test: unpack 2.6.12 tarball from NFS mount source, diff against
previous attempt:
$ diff -Nrup linux-2.6.12.old linux-2.6.12
Binary files linux-2.6.12.old/include/asm-sparc/a.out.h and
linux-2.6.12/include/asm-sparc/a.out.h differ
diff
Greetings,
Situation is dataloss with no errors logged.
Test: unpack 2.6.12 tarball from NFS mount source, diff against
previous attempt:
$ diff -Nrup linux-2.6.12.old linux-2.6.12
Binary files linux-2.6.12.old/include/asm-sparc/a.out.h and
linux-2.6.12/include/asm-sparc/a.out.h differ
diff
16 matches
Mail list logo