[+Eric]
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 10:11:52AM +0200, Alyssa Ross wrote:
> Demi Marie Obenour writes:
>
> > On 6/13/25 14:13, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:08:07PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >>> I’m working on virtio-IOMMU interrupt remapping for
Demi Marie Obenour writes:
> On 6/13/25 14:13, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:08:07PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>>> I’m working on virtio-IOMMU interrupt remapping for Spectrum OS [1],
>>> and am running into a problem. All of the current interrupt r
On 6/13/25 14:13, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:08:07PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> I’m working on virtio-IOMMU interrupt remapping for Spectrum OS [1],
>> and am running into a problem. All of the current interrupt remapping
>> drivers use __init code
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:08:07PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> I’m working on virtio-IOMMU interrupt remapping for Spectrum OS [1],
> and am running into a problem. All of the current interrupt remapping
> drivers use __init code during initialization, and I’m not sure how to
> plumb t
I’m working on virtio-IOMMU interrupt remapping for Spectrum OS [1],
and am running into a problem. All of the current interrupt remapping
drivers use __init code during initialization, and I’m not sure how to
plumb the struct virtio_device * into the IOMMU initialization code.
What is the proper
5 matches
Mail list logo