On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:54:32AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:42:02AM -0700, Natalie Protasevich wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Then I think bugzilla needs:
>>> adding more categories such as security,
>> "security" would be a flag like "regression", not
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:42:02AM -0700, Natalie Protasevich wrote:
...
Then I think bugzilla needs:
adding more categories such as security,
"security" would be a flag like "regression", not a category.
system calls (lots of
implementation suggestions for posix and
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:59:47PM -0700, Natalie Protasevich wrote:
> > Bugzilla is for tracking bugs, not for discussing possible
> > kernel features.
>
> True, but some of them are categorized as bugs from the reporter's
> prospective, when they say "man page says" or "according to POSIX it's
>
> Bugzilla is for tracking bugs, not for discussing possible
> kernel features.
True, but some of them are categorized as bugs from the reporter's
prospective, when they say "man page says" or "according to POSIX it's
wrong". I am going to push ones that are feature suggestions,
re-design suggesti
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:42:02AM -0700, Natalie Protasevich wrote:
>...
> Then I think bugzilla needs:
> adding more categories such as security,
"security" would be a flag like "regression", not a category.
> system calls (lots of
> implementation suggestions for posix and non-posix ones)
n 8/27/07, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/27/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now that I'm looking at the kernel bugzilla .. If you set the kernel
> > version to 2.6.22 and set the "Regression" check box you could denote
> > the fact that it's a regression in that kern
On 8/27/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that I'm looking at the kernel bugzilla .. If you set the kernel
> version to 2.6.22 and set the "Regression" check box you could denote
> the fact that it's a regression in that kernel version ..
>
> I don't know if this URL is going to co
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:08:34 -0700
Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 09:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > It's a hassle when someone doesn't have a bugzilla account. But there are
> > humans sitting behind bugzilla handling stuff (fsvo "human"). I've already
>
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 19:02 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Indeed, now we need a predefined search "show regressions in 2.6.x" :)
>
> So the plan is simple:
> - copy all regressions into bugzilla after each release
> - make sure that all regressions reported on lkml after realase hit bugzilla
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 09:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It's a hassle when someone doesn't have a bugzilla account. But there are
> humans sitting behind bugzilla handling stuff (fsvo "human"). I've already
> forwarded your bugzilla report to Stephane pointing out that he doesn't
> have an acc
Daniel Walker pisze:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 17:26 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>> On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [..]
> I'm not sure that we n
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:26:48 -0700 Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 00:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Daniel Walker pisze:
> > > [snip]
> > > > Have you considered ma
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:44:03AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> What I haven't been doing is ensuring that the Product and Component fields
> are suitably set. That's something which Natalie is now cleaning up.
I always fixed them when they were wrong, and I'd therefore be surprised
if the
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 00:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Daniel Walker pisze:
> > [snip]
> > > Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
> >
> > Yes, I have considered it.
> >
> > Bugzilla
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 18:09 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:41:17AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> >> getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> >>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:41:17AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
>> getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
>> transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
>
> Maybe this was a d
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 17:26 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [..]
> > > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any
On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
> > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can
> > > be
> > > handled via email and/or
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Daniel Walker pisze:
> > > [snip]
> > > > Have you considered maintaining all the li
On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 02:45 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Daniel Walker pisze:
> > [snip]
> > > Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
> >
> > Yes, I have considered it.
> >
> > Bugzilla sucks when it comes to trackin
On 27/08/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 27 August 2007 13:38, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
[..]
> > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release.
>
> The unresolved ones, that is?
Yes, exactly.
> If you can do that, it would be a very good
> thing,
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 02:45 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Daniel Walker pisze:
> [snip]
> > Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
>
> Yes, I have considered it.
>
> Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
> a regression field, but there are no difference
On Monday, 27 August 2007 13:38, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Daniel Walker pisze:
> > > [snip]
> > > > Have you considered maintaining all the list
On 27/08/07, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/26/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
> > a regression field, but there are no difference between
> > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.
>
> Here's how to use Bugzilla to
On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Daniel Walker pisze:
> > [snip]
> > > Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
> >
> > Yes, I have considered it.
> >
> > Bugzilla sucks
On 27/08/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
>
> Maybe this was a dumb as
Andrew Morton wrote:
What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
Maybe this was a dumb assumption on my part, but I thought regressions
were getting rolle
On 8/26/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
> a regression field, but there are no difference between
> 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.
Here's how to use Bugzilla to track regressions between different
kernel versions:
Create
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Walker pisze:
> [snip]
> > Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
>
> Yes, I have considered it.
>
> Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
> a regression field, but th
Daniel Walker pisze:
[snip]
> Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
Yes, I have considered it.
Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
a regression field, but there are no difference between
2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.
Most people are reporting bugs throu
30 matches
Mail list logo
