On 5.8.2013 5.59, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/04/2013 07:48 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>> Any comments on this, Peter? :)
>>
>
> Sounds like you have done the measurements, so it seems fine.
>
> -hpa
>
I've been using these patches. No compalints.
Should the patches get pulled to
On 5.8.2013 5.59, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/04/2013 07:48 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
Any comments on this, Peter? :)
Sounds like you have done the measurements, so it seems fine.
-hpa
I've been using these patches. No compalints.
Should the patches get pulled to linux-next tree for
On 08/04/2013 07:48 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>
> Any comments on this, Peter? :)
>
Sounds like you have done the measurements, so it seems fine.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
On 08/01/2013 04:53 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> From 1322ea9e17ad4d9e49e2d93cfc04805368e28273 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Shi
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:30:23 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tlb/tlb_flushall_shift: add haswell tlb_flush_shift
>
> Tested on i5 4350U with munmap case,
On 08/01/2013 05:07 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> From 6fb21a9ce475cfc6c7c39bdfd3d9422be24cdb74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Shi
> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:28:42 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/tlb_flushall_shift: add Ivybridge EP CPU support
>
> Tested with munmap.c on Ivybridge EP 2S
On 08/01/2013 05:07 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
From 6fb21a9ce475cfc6c7c39bdfd3d9422be24cdb74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi alex@intel.com
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:28:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/tlb_flushall_shift: add Ivybridge EP CPU support
Tested with munmap.c on Ivybridge
On 08/01/2013 04:53 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
From 1322ea9e17ad4d9e49e2d93cfc04805368e28273 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi alex@intel.com
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:30:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tlb/tlb_flushall_shift: add haswell tlb_flush_shift
Tested on i5 4350U with munmap case,
On 08/04/2013 07:48 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
Any comments on this, Peter? :)
Sounds like you have done the measurements, so it seems fine.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
On 08/01/2013 04:53 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> --
> From 1322ea9e17ad4d9e49e2d93cfc04805368e28273 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Shi
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:30:23 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tlb/tlb_flushall_shift: add haswell tlb_flush_shift
>
> Tested on i5 4350U with munmap case,
On 07/31/2013 03:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:44:02PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
>> On 30.7.2013 22.35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:50:49PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
On 07/31/2013 03:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:44:02PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
On 30.7.2013 22.35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:50:49PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
tlb_flushall_shift
On 08/01/2013 04:53 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
--
From 1322ea9e17ad4d9e49e2d93cfc04805368e28273 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi alex@intel.com
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:30:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tlb/tlb_flushall_shift: add haswell tlb_flush_shift
Tested on i5 4350U with
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:44:02PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
> On 30.7.2013 22.35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:50:49PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
> >> Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
> >> tlb_flushall_shift detection logic for Ivy Bridge CPU
On 30.7.2013 22.35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:50:49PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
>> Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
>> tlb_flushall_shift detection logic for Ivy Bridge CPU family but not
>> for Haswell? Maybe intel_cacheinfo.c needs to be checked
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:50:49PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
> Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
> tlb_flushall_shift detection logic for Ivy Bridge CPU family but not
> for Haswell? Maybe intel_cacheinfo.c needs to be checked for Haswell
> updates too.
Because someone
Hi,
Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
tlb_flushall_shift detection logic for Ivy Bridge CPU family but not for
Haswell? Maybe intel_cacheinfo.c needs to be checked for Haswell updates
too.
Regards,
Ilari Stenroth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hi,
Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
tlb_flushall_shift detection logic for Ivy Bridge CPU family but not for
Haswell? Maybe intel_cacheinfo.c needs to be checked for Haswell updates
too.
Regards,
Ilari Stenroth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:50:49PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
tlb_flushall_shift detection logic for Ivy Bridge CPU family but not
for Haswell? Maybe intel_cacheinfo.c needs to be checked for Haswell
updates too.
Because someone needs
On 30.7.2013 22.35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:50:49PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
tlb_flushall_shift detection logic for Ivy Bridge CPU family but not
for Haswell? Maybe intel_cacheinfo.c needs to be checked for
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:44:02PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
On 30.7.2013 22.35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:50:49PM +0300, Ilari Stenroth wrote:
Does somebody know why arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c has
tlb_flushall_shift detection logic for Ivy Bridge CPU family but
20 matches
Mail list logo
