Am 15.08.2013 20:27, schrieb André Hentschel:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Am 15.08.2013 19:29, schrieb Jonathan Austin:
>> Hi André
>> What I've *not* tested:
>> * As this CPU does not have the tls register, I haven't run any tests that
>> try to read/write it, but we wouldn't expect that to work, right?
Hi Jonathan,
Am 15.08.2013 19:29, schrieb Jonathan Austin:
> Hi André
>
> (I've put RMK and LAKML back on Cc: they got dropped somewhere along the way)
>
> On 14/08/13 22:21, André Hentschel wrote:
>> [...]
Now we've only got one instruction between the store and the load
a
Hi André
(I've put RMK and LAKML back on Cc: they got dropped somewhere along the
way)
On 14/08/13 22:21, André Hentschel wrote:
[...]
Now we've only got one instruction between the store and the load
and risk stalling the pipeline...
Dave M cautiously says "The ancient advice was that one
Am 14.08.2013 18:20, schrieb Jonathan Austin:
> Hi André,
>
> On 14/08/13 15:07, André Hentschel wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>> Any updates on this?
>>
>
> I was holding out to see the version with ldrd at the top, as discussed below
> - I never saw a version with that change? I'd meant to ping you t
Hi André,
On 14/08/13 15:07, André Hentschel wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Any updates on this?
I was holding out to see the version with ldrd at the top, as discussed
below - I never saw a version with that change? I'd meant to ping you to
see if that was coming, sorry.
[...]
[...]
Now we've on
Hi Jonathan,
Any updates on this?
Am 17.07.2013 21:49, schrieb André Hentschel:
> Am 17.07.2013 13:10, schrieb Jonathan Austin:
>> Hi André,
>> Do you have access to anything v6-NOT-k-ish? If not I can try and test this
>> on something appropriate. How does your test-case access tpidrurw? If it
Am 17.07.2013 13:10, schrieb Jonathan Austin:
> Hi André,
>
> On 16/07/13 20:27, André Hentschel wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan, First, thank you for your review.
>>
>> Am 16.07.2013 19:31, schrieb Jonathan Austin:
>>> Hi André,
>>>
>>> On 15/07/13 18:14, André Hentschel wrote:
From: André Hentschel
Hi André,
On 16/07/13 20:27, André Hentschel wrote:
Hi Jonathan, First, thank you for your review.
Am 16.07.2013 19:31, schrieb Jonathan Austin:
Hi André,
On 15/07/13 18:14, André Hentschel wrote:
From: André Hentschel
This patch intents to reduce loading instructions when the
resulting va
Hi Jonathan,
First, thank you for your review.
Am 16.07.2013 19:31, schrieb Jonathan Austin:
> Hi André,
>
> On 15/07/13 18:14, André Hentschel wrote:
>> From: André Hentschel
>>
>> This patch intents to reduce loading instructions when the resulting value
>> is not used.
>> It's a follow up on
Hi André,
On 15/07/13 18:14, André Hentschel wrote:
From: André Hentschel
This patch intents to reduce loading instructions when the resulting value is
not used.
It's a follow up on a4780adeefd042482f624f5e0d577bf9cdcbb760
Have you done any benchmarking to see that this has any real impact
From: André Hentschel
This patch intents to reduce loading instructions when the resulting value is
not used.
It's a follow up on a4780adeefd042482f624f5e0d577bf9cdcbb760
Signed-off-by: André Hentschel
---
This patch is against Linux 3.11-rc1 (ad81f0545ef01ea651886dddac4bef6cec930092)
Thanks
11 matches
Mail list logo