On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:01:40PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 07:55:52AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > That said, I'm not advocating people rush out to throw bcachefs on their
> > servers
> > or use it without backups yet, it's still young and needs more widespread
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:01:40PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 07:55:52AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > That said, I'm not advocating people rush out to throw bcachefs on their
> > servers
> > or use it without backups yet, it's still young and needs more widespread
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 07:55:52AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> That said, I'm not advocating people rush out to throw bcachefs on their
> servers
> or use it without backups yet, it's still young and needs more widespread
> testing.
Hi Kent!
Have you started using xfstests to stress test
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 07:55:52AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> That said, I'm not advocating people rush out to throw bcachefs on their
> servers
> or use it without backups yet, it's still young and needs more widespread
> testing.
Hi Kent!
Have you started using xfstests to stress test
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:34:15AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2016-09-06 20:55, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my
> > > servers.
>
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:34:15AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2016-09-06 20:55, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my
> > > servers.
>
On 2016-09-06 20:55, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my servers.
Meaning no offense, but surely I would prefer to have ext4 with a thin "SSD
caching layer" over a
On 2016-09-06 20:55, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my servers.
Meaning no offense, but surely I would prefer to have ext4 with a thin "SSD
caching layer" over a
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my servers.
> Meaning no offense, but surely I would prefer to have ext4 with a thin "SSD
> caching layer" over a completely different filesystem,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my servers.
> Meaning no offense, but surely I would prefer to have ext4 with a thin "SSD
> caching layer" over a completely different filesystem,
Hi folks,
I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my servers.
Meaning no offense, but surely I would prefer to have ext4 with a thin "SSD
caching layer" over a completely different filesystem, potentially with alot
of teething troubles.
Question: Is bcache EOL or can I
Hi folks,
I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my servers.
Meaning no offense, but surely I would prefer to have ext4 with a thin "SSD
caching layer" over a completely different filesystem, potentially with alot
of teething troubles.
Question: Is bcache EOL or can I
12 matches
Mail list logo
