On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:27:53PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > For example the Zyxel 681 SDSL-Router breaks ECN by
> > stripping 0x80 (ECN Cwnd Reduced) but not 0x40 (ECN Echo)
> > (TOS bits) on all SYN packets (!).
> >
> > I complained because of this two times more than a month ago
> > but they
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:27:53PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
For example the Zyxel 681 SDSL-Router breaks ECN by
stripping 0x80 (ECN Cwnd Reduced) but not 0x40 (ECN Echo)
(TOS bits) on all SYN packets (!).
I complained because of this two times more than a month ago
but they do not even
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> If the router claims to be RFC compliant then you may want to investigate
> trading standards bodies. In the UK at least things like the advertising
> standards agency get upset by people who claim standards compliance, are shown
> not to be compliant and
> For example the Zyxel 681 SDSL-Router breaks ECN by
> stripping 0x80 (ECN Cwnd Reduced) but not 0x40 (ECN Echo)
> (TOS bits) on all SYN packets (!).
>
> I complained because of this two times more than a month ago
> but they do not even respond.
If the router claims to be RFC compliant then
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 02:21:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Try echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
> If it helps complain to the sites that their firewall is broken.
Not always firewall related.
There are companies like Zyxel that ship broken router
too.
For example the Zyxel 681
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 02:21:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Try echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
If it helps complain to the sites that their firewall is broken.
Not always firewall related.
There are companies like Zyxel that ship broken router
too.
For example the Zyxel 681 SDSL-Router
For example the Zyxel 681 SDSL-Router breaks ECN by
stripping 0x80 (ECN Cwnd Reduced) but not 0x40 (ECN Echo)
(TOS bits) on all SYN packets (!).
I complained because of this two times more than a month ago
but they do not even respond.
If the router claims to be RFC compliant then you may
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
If the router claims to be RFC compliant then you may want to investigate
trading standards bodies. In the UK at least things like the advertising
standards agency get upset by people who claim standards compliance, are shown
not to be compliant and are
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:35:31PM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 02:21:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Try echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
> > If it helps complain to the sites that their firewall is broken.
>
> It's certain that this refers only to the site firewall?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 02:21:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Try echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
> If it helps complain to the sites that their firewall is broken.
It's certain that this refers only to the site firewall?
I had to do this to get to www.ibm.com. :-<
mrc
--
Mike
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:24:46PM -0400, Dave wrote:
>
> I am having a very strange problem in linux 2.4 kernels. I have not set
> any iptables rules at all, and there is no firewall blocking any of my
> outgoing traffic. At what seems like random selection, I can not connect
> to IP's yet I
This did fix my problem. Thanks very much, I'll be sure to send a polite
message to the admins at sites where I notice this problem! Any detailed
info you might have on why this was failing?
dave
---
This is my signature. There are many like it but this one is mine.
On Tue, 10 Apr
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:24:46PM -0400, Dave wrote:
> I am having a very strange problem in linux 2.4 kernels. I have not set
> any iptables rules at all, and there is no firewall blocking any of my
> outgoing traffic. At what seems like random selection, I can not connect
> to IP's yet I can
I am having a very strange problem in linux 2.4 kernels. I have not set
any iptables rules at all, and there is no firewall blocking any of my
outgoing traffic. At what seems like random selection, I can not connect
to IP's yet I can get ping replies from them. Most IP's reply just fine,
but
I am having a very strange problem in linux 2.4 kernels. I have not set
any iptables rules at all, and there is no firewall blocking any of my
outgoing traffic. At what seems like random selection, I can not connect
to IP's yet I can get ping replies from them. Most IP's reply just fine,
but
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:24:46PM -0400, Dave wrote:
I am having a very strange problem in linux 2.4 kernels. I have not set
any iptables rules at all, and there is no firewall blocking any of my
outgoing traffic. At what seems like random selection, I can not connect
to IP's yet I can get
This did fix my problem. Thanks very much, I'll be sure to send a polite
message to the admins at sites where I notice this problem! Any detailed
info you might have on why this was failing?
dave
---
This is my signature. There are many like it but this one is mine.
On Tue, 10 Apr
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:24:46PM -0400, Dave wrote:
I am having a very strange problem in linux 2.4 kernels. I have not set
any iptables rules at all, and there is no firewall blocking any of my
outgoing traffic. At what seems like random selection, I can not connect
to IP's yet I can
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 02:21:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Try echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
If it helps complain to the sites that their firewall is broken.
It's certain that this refers only to the site firewall?
I had to do this to get to www.ibm.com. :-
mrc
--
Mike Castle
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:35:31PM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 02:21:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Try echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
If it helps complain to the sites that their firewall is broken.
It's certain that this refers only to the site firewall?
I had
20 matches
Mail list logo
