Matthias Juchem wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Richard Torkar wrote:
>
> > I do not have any PPP, and no kdb installed on that machine, neither do I
> > have procinfo. Shouldn't it say N/A or not found instead of the above? The
> > ppp part is not true ;-).
>
> > Other thing I thought about was
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Rafael E. Herrera wrote:
> I have a suggestion, there is a kernel patch to add a config.gz entry in
> the /proc fs. It reflects the configuration used in building the running
> kernel, which may differ from the one you have in /usr/src/linux. It's
> part of the suse
Matthias Juchem wrote:
> http://www.brightice.de/src/bugreport.sh
I have a suggestion, there is a kernel patch to add a config.gz entry in
the /proc fs. It reflects the configuration used in building the running
kernel, which may differ from the one you have in /usr/src/linux. It's
part of the
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Richard Torkar wrote:
> I do not have any PPP, and no kdb installed on that machine, neither do I
> have procinfo. Shouldn't it say N/A or not found instead of the above? The
> ppp part is not true ;-).
> Other thing I thought about was the Ctrl-D thingy when entering
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Richard Torkar wrote:
I do not have any PPP, and no kdb installed on that machine, neither do I
have procinfo. Shouldn't it say N/A or not found instead of the above? The
ppp part is not true ;-).
Other thing I thought about was the Ctrl-D thingy when entering text.
Matthias Juchem wrote:
http://www.brightice.de/src/bugreport.sh
I have a suggestion, there is a kernel patch to add a config.gz entry in
the /proc fs. It reflects the configuration used in building the running
kernel, which may differ from the one you have in /usr/src/linux. It's
part of the
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Rafael E. Herrera wrote:
I have a suggestion, there is a kernel patch to add a config.gz entry in
the /proc fs. It reflects the configuration used in building the running
kernel, which may differ from the one you have in /usr/src/linux. It's
part of the suse
Matthias Juchem wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Richard Torkar wrote:
I do not have any PPP, and no kdb installed on that machine, neither do I
have procinfo. Shouldn't it say N/A or not found instead of the above? The
ppp part is not true ;-).
Other thing I thought about was the Ctrl-D
Hello Matthias , When I run your script under a -very- old
release of slackare (See after .sig) I get the below .
my ldd is ancient .
root@filesrv1:~# ~/bin/bugreport.sh asdfasdfasdf
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Richard Torkar wrote:
> I do not have any PPP, and no kdb installed on that machine, neither do I
> have procinfo. Shouldn't it say N/A or not found instead of the above? The
> ppp part is not true ;-).
Sure. I forgot to convert some function calls... But I'll have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Torkar wrote:
> Matthias Juchem wrote:
>
> > Hi there.
> >
> > I rewrote my previous bugreport.pl in bash. I would appreciate it if you
> > had a look on this one. Run it once and give me feedback if you like.
> >
>
> Well it certantly works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Juchem wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I rewrote my previous bugreport.pl in bash. I would appreciate it if you
> had a look on this one. Run it once and give me feedback if you like.
>
Well it certantly works here. Almost everything is extracted
Hi there.
I rewrote my previous bugreport.pl in bash. I would appreciate it if you
had a look on this one. Run it once and give me feedback if you like.
If the formatting is overloaded please let me know.
If this one is ok, I will probably add the possibility to check
the version
Hi there.
I rewrote my previous bugreport.pl in bash. I would appreciate it if you
had a look on this one. Run it once and give me feedback if you like.
If the formatting is overloaded please let me know.
If this one is ok, I will probably add the possibility to check
the version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Juchem wrote:
Hi there.
I rewrote my previous bugreport.pl in bash. I would appreciate it if you
had a look on this one. Run it once and give me feedback if you like.
Well it certantly works here. Almost everything is extracted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Torkar wrote:
Matthias Juchem wrote:
Hi there.
I rewrote my previous bugreport.pl in bash. I would appreciate it if you
had a look on this one. Run it once and give me feedback if you like.
Well it certantly works here. Almost
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Richard Torkar wrote:
I do not have any PPP, and no kdb installed on that machine, neither do I
have procinfo. Shouldn't it say N/A or not found instead of the above? The
ppp part is not true ;-).
Sure. I forgot to convert some function calls... But I'll have to rewrite
Hello Matthias , When I run your script under a -very- old
release of slackare (See after .sig) I get the below .
my ldd is ancient .
root@filesrv1:~# ~/bin/bugreport.sh asdfasdfasdf
18 matches
Mail list logo
