Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Donnerstag 02 August 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
The tone I see on responses to posts that are CCed to LKML in my
perception often is just completely and utterly awfully unfriendly. And
often those responses actual include factual inaccuracies and
preliminary a
* Carlo Florendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With CFS I also experienced XRUNS from time to time, what never
happened with ck.
>
> See, this is exactly the problem of the SD ranters. A ranter posts a
> problem, doesn't give reproducability hints, and neither provides
> technical det
Am Donnerstag 02 August 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> The tone I see on responses to posts that are CCed to LKML in my
> perception often is just completely and utterly awfully unfriendly. And
> often those responses actual include factual inaccuracies and
> preliminary assumptions as well. I
t; CC: Klaus Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: ck vs. cfs
> > > : realtime audio performance
> > >
> > > Lenar Lõhmus wrote:
> > > > Klaus Schulz wrote:
> > >
Klaus Schulz wrote:
Hello Carlo.
The ranters! comment:
I can understand your way of looking at things.
But you'd better be a bit more careful with statements like these below,
if you don't really know what's going on.
Just FYI: All possible traces - Ingo asked for - are on Ingos desk!
Then
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gesendet: 02.08.07 08:27:01
> An: Lenar Lõhmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Klaus Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance
>
> Lenar L
Lenar Lõhmus wrote:
Klaus Schulz wrote:
I am currently testing the 2.6.22.1 cfs-rt9 vs. ck1 on my rather pure
realtime high-end-audio setup. (NO X, just a terminal, streaming
.wav. I am using my own written player and brutefir as the audio
engine.)
Comment: This is not a standard (amarok or x
> >Am Dienstag, den 31.07.2007, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Klaus Schulz:
> >>I am currently testing the 2.6.22.1 cfs-rt9 vs. ck1 on my rather pure
> >>realtime high-end-audio setup. (NO X, just a terminal, streaming .wav.
> >>I am using my own written player and brutefir as the audio engine.)
> >>Comme
Cc'd to LKML & Ingo.
L.
Klaus Schulz wrote:
Hi there.
Am Dienstag, den 31.07.2007, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Klaus Schulz:
Hi folks.
I am currently testing the 2.6.22.1 cfs-rt9 vs. ck1 on my rather pure
realtime high-end-audio setup. (NO X, just a terminal, streaming .wav.
I am using my own
9 matches
Mail list logo
