Hi!
> >> > Sorry for being late responding to this, but I'd say this is a
> >> prime > example for typedef's considered evil (see Greg's OLS talk
> >> ;).
> >> >
> >> > It would be a lot cleaner if it was made a struct and then
> >> passing a > struct pointer as the argument instead of passing
> "Pavel" == Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Sorry for being late responding to this, but I'd say this is a
>> prime > example for typedef's considered evil (see Greg's OLS talk
>> ;).
>> >
>> > It would be a lot cleaner if it was made a struct and then
>> passing a > struct
Pavel == Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry for being late responding to this, but I'd say this is a
prime example for typedef's considered evil (see Greg's OLS talk
;).
It would be a lot cleaner if it was made a struct and then
passing a struct pointer as the argument
Hi!
Sorry for being late responding to this, but I'd say this is a
prime example for typedef's considered evil (see Greg's OLS talk
;).
It would be a lot cleaner if it was made a struct and then
passing a struct pointer as the argument instead of passing the
struct by value
Hi!
> > Pavel> Hi! Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy,
> > Pavel> so I hope to get his help now... And will probably need more.
> >
> > Pavel> Suspend routines change, slowly.
> >
> > Pavel> - int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, u32 state); + int
> > Pavel>
Hi!
> Pavel> Hi! Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy,
> Pavel> so I hope to get his help now... And will probably need more.
>
> Pavel> Suspend routines change, slowly.
>
> Pavel> - int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, u32 state); + int
> Pavel> (*suspend)(struct device *
> "Pavel" == Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pavel> Hi! Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy,
Pavel> so I hope to get his help now... And will probably need more.
Pavel> Suspend routines change, slowly.
Pavel> - int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, u32 state); +
Pavel == Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pavel Hi! Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy,
Pavel so I hope to get his help now... And will probably need more.
Pavel Suspend routines change, slowly.
Pavel - int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, u32 state); + int
Pavel
Hi!
Pavel Hi! Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy,
Pavel so I hope to get his help now... And will probably need more.
Pavel Suspend routines change, slowly.
Pavel - int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, u32 state); + int
Pavel (*suspend)(struct device * dev,
Hi!
Pavel Hi! Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy,
Pavel so I hope to get his help now... And will probably need more.
Pavel Suspend routines change, slowly.
Pavel - int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, u32 state); + int
Pavel (*suspend)(struct device * dev,
Hi!
> >Now, if you want to help, just convert some drivers... To quickly
> >break compilation in case of bad types, following patch can be used
> >(against 2.6.11-rc2-mm1), it actually switches pm_message_t to
> >typedef.
> >
> >I'm looking forward to the patches, (please help),
>
> I just had a
Hi Pavel,
Pavel Machek wrote:
Now, if you want to help, just convert some drivers... To quickly
break compilation in case of bad types, following patch can be used
(against 2.6.11-rc2-mm1), it actually switches pm_message_t to
typedef.
I'm looking forward to the patches, (please help),
I just had
Hi Pavel,
Pavel Machek wrote:
Now, if you want to help, just convert some drivers... To quickly
break compilation in case of bad types, following patch can be used
(against 2.6.11-rc2-mm1), it actually switches pm_message_t to
typedef.
I'm looking forward to the patches, (please help),
I just had
Hi!
Now, if you want to help, just convert some drivers... To quickly
break compilation in case of bad types, following patch can be used
(against 2.6.11-rc2-mm1), it actually switches pm_message_t to
typedef.
I'm looking forward to the patches, (please help),
I just had a look at
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 20:47 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy, so I hope to
> get his help now... And will probably need more.
I will. I'm still a bit dealing with backlog of stuffs after my long
vacations, but I will asap.
Ben.
-
To
Hi!
Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy, so I hope to
get his help now... And will probably need more.
Suspend routines change, slowly.
- int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, u32 state);
+ int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, pm_message_t
Hi!
Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy, so I hope to
get his help now... And will probably need more.
Suspend routines change, slowly.
- int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, u32 state);
+ int (*suspend)(struct device * dev, pm_message_t
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 20:47 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Two Long time ago, BenH said that making patches is easy, so I hope to
get his help now... And will probably need more.
I will. I'm still a bit dealing with backlog of stuffs after my long
vacations, but I will asap.
Ben.
-
To
18 matches
Mail list logo
