Hi!
> > Set alarm belongs in drivers/rtc, moved now.
> >
> > > > + alarm = now+length;
> > > > + rtc_time_to_tm(alarm, &alm.time);
> > > > +
> > > > + retval = cmos_set_alarm(rtc, &alm);
> > >
> > > cmos_set_alarm() takes a struct device * too.
> >
> > Fixed.
>
> any updated
* Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Set alarm belongs in drivers/rtc, moved now.
>
> > > + alarm = now+length;
> > > + rtc_time_to_tm(alarm, &alm.time);
> > > +
> > > + retval = cmos_set_alarm(rtc, &alm);
> >
> > cmos_set_alarm() takes a struct device * too.
>
> Fixed.
any updated pat
Hi!
> > index f7dfff2..e5693d6 100644
> > --- a/kernel/power/Makefile
> > +++ b/kernel/power/Makefile
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ endif
> >
> > obj-y := main.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PM_LEGACY)+= pm.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += process.o console.o
> >
Hi,
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> index 29cf145..d830ed2 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static inline int is_intr(u8 rtc_intr)
>
> /*---
On Mon 2008-01-21 00:42:08, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Ingo wanted simple sleep self-test... Here's something.
>
> thanks :)
>
> threw it into auto-qa, and it got thrown back with:
Ok... it needs to depend on cmos_rtc... Plus timeout nee
* Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Ingo wanted simple sleep self-test... Here's something.
thanks :)
threw it into auto-qa, and it got thrown back with:
dione:~/linux/linux> ./err
kernel/power/sleepy.c: In function 'set_alarm':
kernel/power/sleepy.c:50: warning: passing argum
Hi!
Ingo wanted simple sleep self-test... Here's something.
set_alarm needs to move into rtc-cmos, and I guess I should boottest
it...
Pavel ~be careful what you wish for~ Machek
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
index 29cf145..d830ed2 100644
-
On Friday, 18 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > (it doesnt matter if graphics does not resume fine - at least for my
> > > tests)
> > >
> > > kprobes had similar problems and it now has a few simple smoke-tests
> > > - which i just saw t
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (it doesnt matter if graphics does not resume fine - at least for my
> > tests)
> >
> > kprobes had similar problems and it now has a few simple smoke-tests
> > - which i just saw trigger on a patch that i did not notice would
> > break kprobes.
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:36:10 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Probably it would be more efficient to have the people who wrote the
> > > > code also test it
* Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/17/2008 08:13 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:36:51 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Heh. Laptop suspend to anything has been so broken for so long in the
>>> -mm series on my Compaq R3000 that I didn't even know it
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:36:10 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Probably it would be more efficient to have the people who wrote the
> > > code also test it.
> >
> > Well, that would certainly help.
> >
> > I do test all of
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Probably it would be more efficient to have the people who wrote the
> > code also test it.
>
> Well, that would certainly help.
>
> I do test all of my patches and generally all of the patches I sign
> off, but surely that's not enough.
ple
On Thursday, 17 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 17 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:36:51 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 22:24 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>>
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:36:51 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 22:24 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
So I take everyone's latest and greatest product and injudiciously type
On 01/17/2008 08:13 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:36:51 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Heh. Laptop suspend to anything has been so broken for so long in the
-mm series on my Compaq R3000 that I didn't even know it was ever
supposed to work.
It gets broken more oft
On Thursday, 17 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:36:51 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 22:24 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > So I take everyone's latest and greatest product and injudiciously type
> > > the
> > > above com
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:36:51 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 22:24 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > So I take everyone's latest and greatest product and injudiciously type the
> > above command. The result five minutes later is at
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/
On Thursday, 17 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> So I take everyone's latest and greatest product and injudiciously type the
> above command. The result five minutes later is at
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/borkage.jpg. See if you can count all the
> bugs.
>
> Sorry, but I've had
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 22:24 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So I take everyone's latest and greatest product and injudiciously type the
> above command. The result five minutes later is at
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/borkage.jpg. See if you can count all the
> bugs.
>
> Sorry, but I've had
So I take everyone's latest and greatest product and injudiciously type the
above command. The result five minutes later is at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/borkage.jpg. See if you can count all the bugs.
Sorry, but I've had it with this stuff and I'm tired of fixing everyone else's
stuff. I
21 matches
Mail list logo