Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:52:08 -0400 Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:55:44 +0400 > Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I look at the 2.6.23-mm1 and see that there's one hunk lost. This > > is the one Oleg re-sent some days ago (the mail thread subject w

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-23 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:55:44 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I look at the 2.6.23-mm1 and see that there's one hunk lost. This > is the one Oleg re-sent some days ago (the mail thread subject was > 2.6.23-mm1 thread exit_group issue). Here it is (sent 13 oct 2007): > > --- kern

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-23 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> >> I guess we can debug it in the old-fashioned ways. The first of which is > >> to palm the problem off on Pavel ;) > > I look at the 2.6.23-mm1 and see that there's one hunk lost. This > is the one Oleg re-sent some days ago (the mail thread subject was > 2.6.23-mm1 thread exit_group issue).

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-23 Thread Pavel Emelyanov
Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> I guess we can debug it in the old-fashioned ways. The first of which is >> to palm the problem off on Pavel ;) I look at the 2.6.23-mm1 and see that there's one hunk lost. This is the one Oleg re-sent some days ago (the mail thread subject was 2.6.23-mm1 thread exit_grou

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-23 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> I guess we can debug it in the old-fashioned ways. The first of which is > to palm the problem off on Pavel ;) > > I don't recall seeing a simple step-by-step way by which others can > reproduce this? My method is this: - enable CONFIG_FUSE_FS - compile fuse from CVS: cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL P

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:38:12PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > Wrt. the UML failures that Miklos is seeing, I imagine UML needs > to do some similar tricks. UML is just an architecture - it has no need of such tricks (although it does need to keep track of host pids, but these are in architecture

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Ian Kent
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 21:38 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:11:43 -0400 > Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have my systems set up to automount my home directory over > > NFS when I log in. When trying to log in to the system with > > 2.6.23-mm1, I get the messag

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:11:43 -0400 Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have my systems set up to automount my home directory over > NFS when I log in. When trying to log in to the system with > 2.6.23-mm1, I get the messages from above in my syslog, and > the NFS filesystem is not automou

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:16:24 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Oct 22 14:39:01 kenny automount[2299]: cache_readlock: mapent > > > > > cache rwlock lock failed > > > > > Oct 22 14:39:01 kenny automount[2299]: unexpected pthreads > > > > > error: 11 at 65 in cache.c > I gues

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:07:42 -0400 Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:29:26 -0400 > Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:48:51 +0200 > > Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I'm getting a process stuck in pthread_rw

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:29:26 -0400 Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:48:51 +0200 > Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm getting a process stuck in pthread_rwlock_wrlock(), even > > > > though it looks like the lock is not held by anybody. > > > >

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:48:51 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm getting a process stuck in pthread_rwlock_wrlock(), even > > > though it looks like the lock is not held by anybody. > > > > > > I think the last -mm was OK. Any ideas? > > > > > > If not, I'll go searching f

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> > I'm getting a process stuck in pthread_rwlock_wrlock(), even though it > > looks like the lock is not held by anybody. > > > > I think the last -mm was OK. Any ideas? > > > > If not, I'll go searching for the offending patch. > > I wonder if that's the same bug that's breaking autofs for me

Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:29:07 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm getting a process stuck in pthread_rwlock_wrlock(), even though it > looks like the lock is not held by anybody. > > I think the last -mm was OK. Any ideas? > > If not, I'll go searching for the offending patch.

futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML

2007-10-22 Thread Miklos Szeredi
I'm getting a process stuck in pthread_rwlock_wrlock(), even though it looks like the lock is not held by anybody. I think the last -mm was OK. Any ideas? If not, I'll go searching for the offending patch. Thanks, Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"