On 06/11/2007 02:14 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
I agree. i18n efforts won't help one iota because people just have
to know English in order to participate in l-k development.
They should be able to read _and_ reply_ to lkml posts,
On 06/11/2007 02:56 AM, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
I agree. i18n efforts won't help one iota because people just have
to know English in order to participate in l-k development.
That's a ridiculous statement. Non-native language
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:11AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Monday 11 June 2007 02:56, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > That's a ridiculous statement. Non-native language abilities and
> > technical competence have very little to do with each other. People have
> > to understand the code and figure
On Monday 11 June 2007 02:56, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > On Sunday 10 June 2007 20:58, Rene Herman wrote:
> > > All that stuff only serves to multiply the speed at which a fixed
> > > percentage of content obsoletes itself. When it's
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
> > > personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
> > > tree and then
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
tree and then perhaps keep
On Monday 11 June 2007 02:56, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 20:58, Rene Herman wrote:
All that stuff only serves to multiply the speed at which a fixed
percentage of content obsoletes itself. When it's still new
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:11AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
On Monday 11 June 2007 02:56, Paul Mundt wrote:
That's a ridiculous statement. Non-native language abilities and
technical competence have very little to do with each other. People have
to understand the code and figure out
On 06/11/2007 02:56 AM, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
I agree. i18n efforts won't help one iota because people just have
to know English in order to participate in l-k development.
That's a ridiculous statement. Non-native language
On 06/11/2007 02:14 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
I agree. i18n efforts won't help one iota because people just have
to know English in order to participate in l-k development.
They should be able to read _and_ reply_ to lkml posts,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Sunday 10 June 2007 20:58, Rene Herman wrote:
> > All that stuff only serves to multiply the speed at which a fixed
> > percentage of content obsoletes itself. When it's still new and
> > shiny, sure, stuff will get translated
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
> > > personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
> > > tree and then
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:41:38PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:52:28 +0200, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > I advocated that they should stay out back then.
> > But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
> > having
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Sunday 10 June 2007 20:58, Rene Herman wrote:
> > All that stuff only serves to multiply the speed at which a fixed
> > percentage
> > of content obsoletes itself. When it's still new and shiny, sure, stuff
> > will
> > get
On Sunday 10 June 2007 20:58, Rene Herman wrote:
> All that stuff only serves to multiply the speed at which a fixed percentage
> of content obsoletes itself. When it's still new and shiny, sure, stuff will
> get translated but in no time at all it'll become a fragmented mess which
> nobody
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:35:03PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Jun 10 2007 19:52, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >> > Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
> >> > personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
> >> > tree and then perhaps keep
On 06/10/2007 08:58 PM, Rene Herman wrote:
RESIST! UNITE!
Stick a ";-)" on that, by the way...
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
El Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:52:28 +0200, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I advocated that they should stay out back then.
> But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
> having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc araound.
>
> Any opinion about the .po files?
These days the
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:35:03PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> No, I think the translated files should be in the tree proper, we have
> >> the space :)
> >
> >We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then
> >the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree.
> >
> >I
On 06/10/2007 07:52 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then
the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree.
I advocated that they should stay out back then.
But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
having
On Jun 10 2007 19:52, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> > Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
>> > personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
>> > tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the
>> > authoritative docs stay
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
> > personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
> > tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the
> > authoritative
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the
authoritative docs
On Jun 10 2007 19:52, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the
authoritative docs stay in the
On 06/10/2007 07:52 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then
the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree.
I advocated that they should stay out back then.
But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
having
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:35:03PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
No, I think the translated files should be in the tree proper, we have
the space :)
We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then
the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree.
I advocated that they
El Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:52:28 +0200, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I advocated that they should stay out back then.
But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc araound.
Any opinion about the .po files?
These days the
On 06/10/2007 08:58 PM, Rene Herman wrote:
RESIST! UNITE!
Stick a ;-) on that, by the way...
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:35:03PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 10 2007 19:52, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
tree and then perhaps keep translations
On Sunday 10 June 2007 20:58, Rene Herman wrote:
All that stuff only serves to multiply the speed at which a fixed percentage
of content obsoletes itself. When it's still new and shiny, sure, stuff will
get translated but in no time at all it'll become a fragmented mess which
nobody ever
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 20:58, Rene Herman wrote:
All that stuff only serves to multiply the speed at which a fixed
percentage
of content obsoletes itself. When it's still new and shiny, sure, stuff
will
get translated
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:41:38PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
El Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:52:28 +0200, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I advocated that they should stay out back then.
But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
tree and then perhaps keep
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 20:58, Rene Herman wrote:
All that stuff only serves to multiply the speed at which a fixed
percentage of content obsoletes itself. When it's still new and
shiny, sure, stuff will get translated but in no
34 matches
Mail list logo
