On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 07:49:52 -0800
"Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Nicholas Piggin
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2 Dec 2016 2:35 AM, "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Nicholas Piggin
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:04:30 +1100
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> BTW the test driver lib/test_linktables/test-linktables.c seems to
> fail on ppc at run time at:
>
> rc = trigger_config_run_named(test_dev, ".text");
>
> I'm having issues getting a ppc / ppc64 box going to easily verify and
> objdump /
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Nicholas Piggin
wrote:
>
> On 2 Dec 2016 2:35 AM, "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Nicholas Piggin
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:04:30 +1100
>> > Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:15:27 -0800
>> >> "
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:04:30 +1100
> Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:15:27 -0800
>> "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:38:16 +0100
>>
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:04:30 +1100
Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:15:27 -0800
> "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:38:16 +0100
> > > "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 201
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:15:27 -0800
"Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:38:16 +0100
> > "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:09:47PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> >> What is wrong with that
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:38:16 +0100
> "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:09:47PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> I actually no longer have a need to have module-common.lds generated given
>> I no longer am using mac
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:38:16 +0100
"Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:09:47PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:33:49 +0100
> > "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:18:40AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > Hi Luis,
>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:09:47PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:33:49 +0100
> "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:18:40AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Hi Luis,
> > >
> > > On 11/23/2016 08:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > Guenter,
>
On 11/29/2016 05:33 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:18:40AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi Luis,
On 11/23/2016 08:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Guenter,
I think I'm ready to start pushing a new patch set out for review.
Before I do that -- can I trouble you for letti
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:33:49 +0100
"Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:18:40AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi Luis,
> >
> > On 11/23/2016 08:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Guenter,
> > >
> > > I think I'm ready to start pushing a new patch set out for review.
>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:18:40AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On 11/23/2016 08:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Guenter,
> >
> > I think I'm ready to start pushing a new patch set out for review.
> > Before I do that -- can I trouble you for letting your test
> > infrastructure
Hi Luis,
On 11/23/2016 08:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Guenter,
I think I'm ready to start pushing a new patch set out for review.
Before I do that -- can I trouble you for letting your test
infrastructure hammer it? I'll only push out the patches for review
based on this new set of changes
On 11/23/2016 08:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Guenter,
I think I'm ready to start pushing a new patch set out for review.
Before I do that -- can I trouble you for letting your test
infrastructure hammer it? I'll only push out the patches for review
Pushed into my testing branch
based on
Guenter,
I think I'm ready to start pushing a new patch set out for review.
Before I do that -- can I trouble you for letting your test
infrastructure hammer it? I'll only push out the patches for review
based on this new set of changes once all tests come back OK for all
architectures.
https://g
15 matches
Mail list logo