On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:16:14AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 1/17/21 10:48 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20210115:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> lib/iov_iter.o: warning: objtool: iovec_from_user()+0x157: call to
> __ubsan_handle_add_overflow() with UACCESS enable
On 1/17/21 10:48 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20210115:
>
on x86_64:
lib/iov_iter.o: warning: objtool: iovec_from_user()+0x157: call to
__ubsan_handle_add_overflow() with UACCESS enabled
fs/select.o: warning: objtool: do_sys_poll()+0x669: call to
__ubsan_handle_sub_
Hi all,
Changes since 20210115:
New trees: oprofile-removal gpio-brgl-fixes
The drm tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree but still had its
build failure so I used the version from next-20210107.
The amdgpu tree lost its build failure.
The drm-intel tree still had its build failure from m
Hi
On 1/18/19 6:27 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 1/17/19 8:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20190117:
on i386 or x86_64:
ld: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.o: in function
`dw_i2c_plat_resume':
i2c-designware-platdrv.c:(.text+0x4b): undefined reference to
`i2c_
Hi all,
Changes since 20190117:
The arc-current tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch.
The mali-dp tree still had its failure for which I applied a merge
fix patch.
The imx-drm tree gained a build failure for which I re
Hi all,
Changes since 20180117:
The powerpc tree gained a conflict against the powerpc-fixes tree.
The f2fs tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with the
btrfs tree for which I reverted a commit.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
Non-merge commits (relative
On 18 January 2017 at 20:44, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20170117:
>>
>> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
>>
>> The amlogic tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
>>
>> Non-me
(+ Arnd)
On 18 January 2017 at 20:44, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20170117:
>>
>> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
>>
>> The amlogic tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
>>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20170117:
>
> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
>
> The amlogic tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
>
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3676
> 4511 files changed
Hi all,
Changes since 20170117:
The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
The amlogic tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3676
4511 files changed, 139928 insertions(+), 85028 deletions(-)
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Changes since 20130117:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `signing_key.x509', needed by
> `kernel/x509_certificate_list'. Stop.
>
>
> Full randconfig file is attached.
Works for me. It's likely that the changes I made on the 18th aren't in
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 02:50:17 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> > On Friday, January 18, 2013 05:42:20 PM Randy Dunlap
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 02:50:17 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > On Friday, January 18, 2013 05:42:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> >> On 01/17/13 20:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 02:50:17 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, January 18, 2013 05:42:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 01/17/13 20:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Changes since 20130117:
> >> >
> >>
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, January 18, 2013 05:42:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 01/17/13 20:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Changes since 20130117:
>> >
>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> CC drivers/acpi/device_pm.o
>> drivers/acpi/dev
On Friday, January 18, 2013 05:42:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/17/13 20:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130117:
> >
>
>
> on x86_64:
>
> CC drivers/acpi/device_pm.o
> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:778:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_dev_suspend_late'
> In
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130117:
>
> Undropped tree: samung
>
> The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
>
> The driver-core tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge
> fix patch.
>
> The gpio-lw tree gained a build fai
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:41:11 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:41:11 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Di
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:41:11 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Rafael
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:41:11 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Di
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:41:11 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Rafael
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:41:11 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:56:53 PM
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:56:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Sedat Dil
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:56:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Sedat Dilek
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Rafael
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:56:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dile
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:54 PM, David Howells wrote:
>> Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>>> Culprit seems to be...
>>>
>>> commit d6941c0c6bd42c725e45240a86c4add92e9bfb3e
>>> "KEYS: Separate the kernel signature checking keyring from module signing"
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:56:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:54 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
>> Culprit seems to be...
>>
>> commit d6941c0c6bd42c725e45240a86c4add92e9bfb3e
>> "KEYS: Separate the kernel signature checking keyring from module signing"
>
> Try updating. I pushed a new version out today. This is
On 01/17/13 20:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130117:
>
on i386;
drivers/built-in.o: In function `clamp_thread':
intel_powerclamp.c:(.text+0x2d39ae): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `poll_pkg_cstate':
intel_powerclamp.c:(.text+0x2d3
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:35:40 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Changes since 201
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > Changes since 20130117:
>>>
Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Culprit seems to be...
>
> commit d6941c0c6bd42c725e45240a86c4add92e9bfb3e
> "KEYS: Separate the kernel signature checking keyring from module signing"
Try updating. I pushed a new version out today. This is now at commit ID
c82af351e270e0d95059d09a1975b61494fbbcd7.
Davi
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Changes since 20130117:
>> >
>> > Undropped tree: samung
>> >
>> > The powerpc tree still
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130117:
> >
> > Undropped tree: samung
> >
> > The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
> >
> > The driver-core tree gained a build failur
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130117:
>>
>> Undropped tree: samung
>>
>> The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
>>
>> The driver-core tree gained a build failure for which I
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130117:
>
> Undropped tree: samung
>
> The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
>
> The driver-core tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge
> fix patch.
>
> The gpio-lw tree gained a build fai
Hi all,
Changes since 20130117:
Undropped tree: samung
The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
The driver-core tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge
fix patch.
The gpio-lw tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130117.
The samsung tree lost the maj
38 matches
Mail list logo