Hi Luiz,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 04:47:04 + "Von Dentz, Luiz"
wrote:
>
> I'd leave this for Marcel to comments, but there are quite many
> instances of // comment like that, so I wonder what is going on, or
> perhaps that is not allowed in include/uapi?
We only do these standalone compile
Hi all,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from :32:
./usr/include/linux/virtio_bt.h:1:1: error: C++ style comments are not allowed
in ISO C90
1 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
| ^
Same here, thanks for the fix!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:22 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> The fixup looks good to me, thanks.
The fixup looks good to me, thanks.
Hi all,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
net/bluetooth/sco.c: In function 'sco_sock_setsockopt':
net/bluetooth/sco.c:862:3: error: cannot convert to a pointer type
862 | if (get_user(opt, (u32 __user *)optval)) {
|
Hi all,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c:34:
drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h: In function 'btintel_reset_to_bootloader':
drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h:188:9: warning: 'return' with
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:20:15 +1000
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Subject: drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c: seq_printf() now returns NULL
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
> Cc: Alexander Aring
> Cc: Stefan Schmidt
> Cc: Marcel Holtmann
> Signed-off-by: Andrew
Hi Gustavo,
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:22:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:14:28 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > I applied the patches that Andrew has had in his post merge series
> > (but I think you were sent a rolled up version):
>
> Actually it was sent by
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:20:15 +1000
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Subject: drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c: seq_printf() now returns NULL
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
> Cc: Alexander Aring
Hi Gustavo,
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:22:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:14:28 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > I applied the patches that Andrew has had in his post merge series
> > (but I think you were sent a
Hi Gustavo,
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:14:28 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> I applied the patches that Andrew has had in his post merge series
> (but I think you were sent a rolled up version):
Actually it was sent by Alexander to Marcel:
From: Alexander Aring
To: mar...@holtmann.org
Cc:
Hi Gustavo,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c: In function 'at86rf230_s
tats_show':
drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c:1650:6: error: void value not ignored as it
ought to be
ret =
Hi Gustavo,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c: In function 'at86rf230_s
tats_show':
drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c:1650:6: error: void value not ignored as it
ought to be
ret =
Hi Gustavo,
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:14:28 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> I applied the patches that Andrew has had in his post merge series
> (but I think you were sent a rolled up version):
Actually it was sent by Alexander to Marcel:
From: Alexander Aring
Hi Gustavo,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c: In function 'bcm_acpi_probe':
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c:458:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_dev_get_resources'
Hi Gustavo,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c: In function 'bcm_acpi_probe':
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c:458:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_dev_get_resources'
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/bluetooth/smp.o: In function `test_smp':
> smp.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module'
>
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
net/bluetooth/smp.o: In function `test_smp':
smp.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module'
Hi Gustavo,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
net/bluetooth/smp.o: In function `test_smp':
smp.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module'
net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.o:af_bluetooth.c:(.init.text+0x0): first defined
Hi Gustavo,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
net/bluetooth/smp.o: In function `test_smp':
smp.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module'
net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.o:af_bluetooth.c:(.init.text+0x0): first defined
Hi Gustavo,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c:100:2: error: expected '}' before '{' token
Caused by commit 493969cf4728 ("Bluetooth: Add support for BCM20702A0
[04ca, 2003]"). That wasn't really well
Hi Gustavo,
After merging the bluetooth tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c:100:2: error: expected '}' before '{' token
Caused by commit 493969cf4728 (Bluetooth: Add support for BCM20702A0
[04ca, 2003]). That wasn't really well
22 matches
Mail list logo