On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:37:33PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:28:19 +1000
>
> > Hi Dave,
> ...
> > This fix patch is now needed in the net-next tree ...
>
> Applied thanks Stephen.
Doh! Sorry I missed that one...
--
John W. Linville
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:37:33PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:28:19 +1000
Hi Dave,
...
This fix patch is now needed in the net-next tree ...
Applied thanks Stephen.
Doh! Sorry I missed that one...
--
John W.
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:28:19 +1000
> Hi Dave,
...
> This fix patch is now needed in the net-next tree ...
Applied thanks Stephen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:42:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c: In function 'open_file_eeprom':
>
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:42:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c: In function 'open_file_eeprom':
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:28:19 +1000
Hi Dave,
...
This fix patch is now needed in the net-next tree ...
Applied thanks Stephen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c: In function 'open_file_eeprom':
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c:933:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vmalloc'
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c: In function 'open_file_eeprom':
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c:933:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vmalloc'
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:28:51PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c: In function
> 'rtw_free_stainfo23a':
>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:28:51PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c: In function
'rtw_free_stainfo23a':
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c: In function 'rtw_free_stainfo23a':
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c:254:27: error: expected expression
before ';' token
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c: In function 'rtw_free_stainfo23a':
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c:254:27: error: expected expression
before ';' token
Hi Stephen,
> Hi John,
>
> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c: In function 'mwifiex_pcie_fw_dump_work':
> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c:2290:3: error: implicit declaration of
>
Hi Stephen,
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c: In function 'mwifiex_pcie_fw_dump_work':
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c:2290:3: error: implicit declaration of
function
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c: In function 'mwifiex_pcie_fw_dump_work':
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c:2290:3: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vmalloc'
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c: In function 'mwifiex_pcie_fw_dump_work':
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c:2290:3: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vmalloc'
On 03/06/2014 03:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c: In function
> 'brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus':
>
On 03/06/2014 03:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build
(arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c: In function
'brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus':
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c: In function
'brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus':
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c:2464:3: error: implicit
declaration
Hi John,
[I started by reverting commit 161d78555435 "Revert "Staging: rtl8812ae:
remove modules field of rate_control_ops""]
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c:91:0:
Hi John,
[I started by reverting commit 161d78555435 Revert Staging: rtl8812ae:
remove modules field of rate_control_ops]
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c:91:0:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c: In function
'brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus':
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c:2464:3: error: implicit
declaration
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:09AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > If I revert commit 161d78555435 "Revert "Staging: rtl8812ae: remove
> > modules field of rate_control_ops"", it fails differently:
> >
> > In
Hi John,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> If I revert commit 161d78555435 "Revert "Staging: rtl8812ae: remove
> modules field of rate_control_ops"", it fails differently:
>
> In file included from drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c:91:0:
>
Hi John,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:47:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:07:16 -0500 "John W. Linville"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:35:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
Hi John,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:47:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:07:16 -0500 John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:35:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the wireless-next tree,
Hi John,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
If I revert commit 161d78555435 Revert Staging: rtl8812ae: remove
modules field of rate_control_ops, it fails differently:
In file included from drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211netdev.c:91:0:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:09AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi John,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
If I revert commit 161d78555435 Revert Staging: rtl8812ae: remove
modules field of rate_control_ops, it fails differently:
In
Hi John,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:07:16 -0500 "John W. Linville"
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:35:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:35:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rc.c:289:2: error: unknown field 'module' specified
> in initializer
>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:35:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rc.c:289:2: error: unknown field 'module' specified
in initializer
.module =
Hi John,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:07:16 -0500 John W. Linville linvi...@tuxdriver.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:35:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rc.c:289:2: error: unknown field 'module' specified
in initializer
.module = NULL,
^
Caused by commit 161d78555435 ("Revert "Staging: rtl8812ae: remove
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rc.c:289:2: error: unknown field 'module' specified
in initializer
.module = NULL,
^
Caused by commit 161d78555435 (Revert Staging: rtl8812ae: remove
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 01:22:15PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >> Hi John,
> >>
> >> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rc.c:289:2: error:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rc.c:289:2: error: unknown field 'module' specified
> in initializer
> .module = NULL,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rc.c:289:2: error: unknown field 'module' specified
in initializer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Gortmaker
paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 01:22:15PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Gortmaker
paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's
Hi John,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:19:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> I added this merge fix patch and can carry it as necessary (John, if you
> back merge v3.14-rc1, you should include this patch in the merge commit):
Actually, your tree is based on -rc2, so you need this patch already (it
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rc.c:289:2: error: unknown field 'module' specified
in initializer
.module = NULL,
^
Caused by commit cc01f9b55fe7 ("mac80211: remove module handling
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rc.c:289:2: error: unknown field 'module' specified
in initializer
.module = NULL,
^
Caused by commit cc01f9b55fe7 (mac80211: remove module handling
Hi John,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:19:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
I added this merge fix patch and can carry it as necessary (John, if you
back merge v3.14-rc1, you should include this patch in the merge commit):
Actually, your tree is based on -rc2, so you need this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2013 03:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c:19:27: fatal error:
> bcm47xx_nvram.h:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2013 03:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c:19:27: fatal error:
bcm47xx_nvram.h: No such
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c:19:27: fatal error: bcm47xx_nvram.h: No
such file or directory
#include
^
That file only exists for the MIPS
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c:19:27: fatal error: bcm47xx_nvram.h: No
such file or directory
#include bcm47xx_nvram.h
^
That file only exists for
On 04/01/2013 10:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Larry,
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:07:24 -0500 Larry Finger
wrote:
On 04/01/2013 09:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
Hi Larry,
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:07:24 -0500 Larry Finger
wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2013 09:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c:30:18:
On 04/01/2013 09:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c:30:18: fatal error: wifi.h: No such
file or directory
Caused by commit f0eb856e0b6c
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c:30:18: fatal error: wifi.h: No such
file or directory
Caused by commit f0eb856e0b6c ("rtlwifi: rtl8188ee: Add new driver").
Forgot a file?
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c:30:18: fatal error: wifi.h: No such
file or directory
Caused by commit f0eb856e0b6c (rtlwifi: rtl8188ee: Add new driver).
Forgot a file?
On 04/01/2013 09:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi John,
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c:30:18: fatal error: wifi.h: No such
file or directory
Caused by commit f0eb856e0b6c
Hi Larry,
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:07:24 -0500 Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net
wrote:
On 04/01/2013 09:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
On 04/01/2013 10:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Larry,
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:07:24 -0500 Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net
wrote:
On 04/01/2013 09:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the wireless-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
56 matches
Mail list logo