On 2016-07-27 01:09, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>> Dne 14.6.2016 v 18:39 Kees Cook napsal(a):
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>>> wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:01:42 +0200 Michal Marek wrote:
>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 14.6.2016 v 18:39 Kees Cook napsal(a):
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:01:42 +0200 Michal Marek wrote:
I won't :). Kees, are you going to keep the pa
Dne 14.6.2016 v 18:39 Kees Cook napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:01:42 +0200 Michal Marek wrote:
>>>
>>> I won't :). Kees, are you going to keep the patch in your tree and send
>>> it to Linus once kbuild is in? Or
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:01:42 +0200 Michal Marek wrote:
>>
>> I won't :). Kees, are you going to keep the patch in your tree and send
>> it to Linus once kbuild is in? Or shall I take it (which would
>> temporarily result in
Hi Michal,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:01:42 +0200 Michal Marek wrote:
>
> I won't :). Kees, are you going to keep the patch in your tree and send
> it to Linus once kbuild is in? Or shall I take it (which would
> temporarily result in another duplication...).
Or Kees could send you a pull request ..
On 2016-06-14 06:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:57:15 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>
>>> Strange, I pulled these directly from linux-next. Michal had an
>>> auto-responder saying he was going to be out-of-offi
Hi Kees,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:57:15 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > Strange, I pulled these directly from linux-next. Michal had an
> > auto-responder saying he was going to be out-of-office, so I wanted to
> > make sure the !COMPILE_TEST fi
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi Kees,
>>
>> As of today, there are four duplicate patches (different commits)
>> in the kspp and kbuild trees.
>>
>> Shared library support
>> GCC plugin infrastructure
>> A
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> As of today, there are four duplicate patches (different commits)
> in the kspp and kbuild trees.
>
> Shared library support
> GCC plugin infrastructure
> Add Cyclomatic complexity GCC plugin
> Add sancov plugin
>
> ar
Hi Kees,
As of today, there are four duplicate patches (different commits)
in the kspp and kbuild trees.
Shared library support
GCC plugin infrastructure
Add Cyclomatic complexity GCC plugin
Add sancov plugin
are in both trees as different commits :-( They have been in the kbuild
tree f
10 matches
Mail list logo