Jon Masters wrote:
Sergey Vlasov wrote:
Has a final decision about generated files been made? I don't see any
updates in the git repo, and man pages are still broken
I'm doing some patching this afternoon anyway, and it's on my todo.
I pushed up v3.3-pre11 just now. If all goes to plan,
Jon Masters wrote:
Sergey Vlasov wrote:
Has a final decision about generated files been made? I don't see any
updates in the git repo, and man pages are still broken
I'm doing some patching this afternoon anyway, and it's on my todo.
I pushed up v3.3-pre11 just now. If all goes to plan,
Em Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:03:45 +0300
Sergey Vlasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
| > Jan Engelhardt wrote:
| >
| > >Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not
| > >always hold for CVS repos, much less
Sergey Vlasov wrote:
Has a final decision about generated files been made? I don't see any
updates in the git repo, and man pages are still broken
I'm doing some patching this afternoon anyway, and it's on my todo.
Jon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> >Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not
> >always hold for CVS repos, much less SVNs [random guess on svn]. He who
> >pulls
> >from a developer tree mostly knows to run
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not
always hold for CVS repos, much less SVNs [random guess on svn]. He who
pulls
from a developer tree mostly knows to run
Sergey Vlasov wrote:
Has a final decision about generated files been made? I don't see any
updates in the git repo, and man pages are still broken
I'm doing some patching this afternoon anyway, and it's on my todo.
Jon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
Em Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:03:45 +0300
Sergey Vlasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
| On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
| Jan Engelhardt wrote:
|
| Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not
| always hold for CVS repos, much less SVNs
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not
always hold for CVS repos, much less SVNs [random guess on svn]. He who pulls
from a developer tree mostly knows to run 'autogen.sh' or 'autoreconf -fi'
beforehand.
You know what, you're right of
On Feb 23 2007 10:41, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> I think it's like the configure/Makefile.in situation. These files should
> technically not be in the repo either (and you removed them in your tree) but
> I
> re-added them because people have an expectation that:
>
> ./configure
> make
>
> will do
On Feb 23 2007 10:41, Jon Masters wrote:
I think it's like the configure/Makefile.in situation. These files should
technically not be in the repo either (and you removed them in your tree) but
I
re-added them because people have an expectation that:
./configure
make
will do something
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not
always hold for CVS repos, much less SVNs [random guess on svn]. He who pulls
from a developer tree mostly knows to run 'autogen.sh' or 'autoreconf -fi'
beforehand.
You know what, you're right of
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:52:20 -0500
Jon Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Sergey Vlasov wrote:
|
| > I see that you have merged some patches which change depmod.8.
| > However, this file is generated from doc/depmod.sgml, which was not
| > changed
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:52:20 -0500
Jon Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Sergey Vlasov wrote:
|
| > I see that you have merged some patches which change depmod.8.
| > However, this file is generated from doc/depmod.sgml, which was not
| > changed appropriately.
|
| Ah. A valid point - Luiz,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:52:20 -0500
Jon Masters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Sergey Vlasov wrote:
|
| I see that you have merged some patches which change depmod.8.
| However, this file is generated from doc/depmod.sgml, which was not
| changed appropriately.
|
| Ah. A valid point - Luiz, do
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:52:20 -0500
Jon Masters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Sergey Vlasov wrote:
|
| I see that you have merged some patches which change depmod.8.
| However, this file is generated from doc/depmod.sgml, which was not
| changed
Sergey Vlasov wrote:
I see that you have merged some patches which change depmod.8.
However, this file is generated from doc/depmod.sgml, which was not
changed appropriately.
Ah. A valid point - Luiz, do you want to redo your patch or I can take a
look at the SGML source myself.
Jon.
-
To
Sergey Vlasov wrote:
I see that you have merged some patches which change depmod.8.
However, this file is generated from doc/depmod.sgml, which was not
changed appropriately.
Ah. A valid point - Luiz, do you want to redo your patch or I can take a
look at the SGML source myself.
Jon.
-
To
Yo,
After some delay[0] I have uploaded a new version of module-init-tools
to http://www.kerneltools.org/
This release mostly has a bunch of build fixes, some memory leakage
cleanups that will benefit systems that actually run out of memory
(embedded, etc.) and various other things in the
Yo,
After some delay[0] I have uploaded a new version of module-init-tools
to http://www.kerneltools.org/
This release mostly has a bunch of build fixes, some memory leakage
cleanups that will benefit systems that actually run out of memory
(embedded, etc.) and various other things in the
20 matches
Mail list logo
