On Apr 1 2007 08:17, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> - your patch was cut and cannot apply to anything. A proper patch starts
> with line beginning with "---" line, followed by a line with "+++",
> both indicating the file your patch is supposed to apply to. Make your
> patch with one
Alan Cox napsal(a):
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:24:12 -0700
> "Pedram M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
>> If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
>> doing wrong.
>
> You need to hold a reference to the PCI device for the entire duration it
>
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:24:12 -0700
"Pedram M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
> If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
> doing wrong.
You need to hold a reference to the PCI device for the entire duration it
is used. I think you actually also
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:24:12 -0700
Pedram M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
doing wrong.
You need to hold a reference to the PCI device for the entire duration it
is used. I think you actually also need
Alan Cox napsal(a):
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:24:12 -0700
Pedram M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
doing wrong.
You need to hold a reference to the PCI device for the entire duration it
is used. I
On Apr 1 2007 08:17, Willy Tarreau wrote:
- your patch was cut and cannot apply to anything. A proper patch starts
with line beginning with --- line, followed by a line with +++,
both indicating the file your patch is supposed to apply to. Make your
patch with one level
Pedram M wrote:
How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
doing wrong.
You need a changelog entry (or explanation of what you're doing). You
need a signed-off-by line and your patch needs to apply to the root of
the kernel tree with -p1,
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 10:24:12PM -0700, Pedram M wrote:
> How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
> If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
> doing wrong.
You have made several mistakes :
- you must select an appropriate subject for your mail. Nobody cares
that it is
How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
doing wrong.
@@ -4760,7 +4760,7 @@
for (i = 0; i < NR_CARDS; i++) {
/* look for a Cyclades card by vendor and device id */
while ((device_id =
How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
doing wrong.
@@ -4760,7 +4760,7 @@
for (i = 0; i NR_CARDS; i++) {
/* look for a Cyclades card by vendor and device id */
while ((device_id =
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 10:24:12PM -0700, Pedram M wrote:
How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
doing wrong.
You have made several mistakes :
- you must select an appropriate subject for your mail. Nobody cares
that it is
Pedram M wrote:
How about this one? Am I doing it right now?
If not, please try to explain more to me what I am
doing wrong.
You need a changelog entry (or explanation of what you're doing). You
need a signed-off-by line and your patch needs to apply to the root of
the kernel tree with -p1,
12 matches
Mail list logo
