>
Thank you for the information.
I will give it some thought and see if I can come up
with something that will fit both bills...
The problem is that the disks that I have are
very wide-spread, I would imagine. Compaq is shipping
them in their newe
"chen, xiangping" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I met a problem when trying to upgrade my Linux kernel to 2.4.0-test10.
> The machine is Compay AP550, dual processor, mem 512 MB, and 863 MHZ freq.
> It has two scsi host adaptors. one is AIC-7892 ultra 160/m connected to
> internal hard disk, and the oth
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:24:47PM -0600, Elizabeth Morris-Baker wrote:
> >
>
> Yes, I know that is in the spec, but truly,
> some scsi devices do act this way
> Maybe they need to read the spec :>
>
> I have included the START_STOP for Matthew, but
> I never s
02, 2000 4:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10?
>
> Hello,
Yes, I encountered the same problem, and have a fix, but
want to test it. If the author of scsi_scan.c would like
to correct it, then that wo
>
Yes, I know that is in the spec, but truly,
some scsi devices do act this way
Maybe they need to read the spec :>
I have included the START_STOP for Matthew, but
I never see it execute with the ATLAS disks...
A diff follows for those that wa
The SCSI spec says that INQUIRY and not
TUR + INQUIRY is the way to go, but maybe we
should make it a compile time option for buggy
drives.
On Thu, Nov 02 2000, Elizabeth Morris-Baker wrote:
> >
>
> You need to send the TUR first, but yes,
> START_STOP will guarantee that you are
: Elizabeth Morris-Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 4:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10?
>
> Hello,
Yes, I encountered the same problem, and have a fix, but
want to test it. If the aut
>
You need to send the TUR first, but yes,
START_STOP will guarantee that you are
ready to rock and roll.
The first fix I wrote did a TUR, then
3 tries at a START_STOP, till it worked.
cheers,
Elizabeth
>
> --8t9RHnE3Z
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 03:58:24PM -0600, Elizabeth Morris-Baker wrote:
> Basically the problem is in scan_scsis_single.
> Some scsi devices are notoriously brain dead
> about answering inquiries without having
> recived a TUR and then spinning up.
> The problem seem
>
> Hello,
Yes, I encountered the same problem, and have a fix, but
want to test it. If the author of scsi_scan.c would like
to correct it, then that would be fine.
Basically the problem is in scan_scsis_single.
Some scsi devices are notoriously brain dea
Hello,
I met a problem when trying to upgrade my Linux kernel to 2.4.0-test10.
The machine is Compay AP550, dual processor, mem 512 MB, and 863 MHZ freq.
It has two scsi host adaptors. one is AIC-7892 ultra 160/m connected to
internal hard disk, and the other is AHA-3944 ultra scsi connected to
11 matches
Mail list logo
