Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-28 Thread Donald Buczek
On 27.12.20 18:34, Donald Buczek wrote: On 18.12.20 19:35, Donald Buczek wrote: On 18.12.20 16:35, Brian Foster wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:30:37PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: On 17.12.20 20:43, Brian Foster wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: Dear

Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-27 Thread Donald Buczek
On 18.12.20 19:35, Donald Buczek wrote: On 18.12.20 16:35, Brian Foster wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:30:37PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: On 17.12.20 20:43, Brian Foster wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: Dear xfs developer, I was doing some testing on

Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-27 Thread Donald Buczek
On 21.12.20 13:22, Donald Buczek wrote: On 18.12.20 22:49, Dave Chinner wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: Dear xfs developer, I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs filesystems on md raid6 raids. The stress test was essential

Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-21 Thread Donald Buczek
On 18.12.20 22:49, Dave Chinner wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: Dear xfs developer, I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs filesystems on md raid6 raids. The stress test was essentially `cp -a`ing a Linux source repository w

Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-18 Thread Dave Chinner
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: > Dear xfs developer, > > I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs > filesystems on md raid6 raids. > > The stress test was essentially `cp -a`ing a Linux source repository with two > threads in parallel

Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-18 Thread Donald Buczek
On 18.12.20 16:35, Brian Foster wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:30:37PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: On 17.12.20 20:43, Brian Foster wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: Dear xfs developer, I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs

Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-18 Thread Brian Foster
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:30:37PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: > On 17.12.20 20:43, Brian Foster wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: > > > Dear xfs developer, > > > > > > I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs > > > filesystems

Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-17 Thread Donald Buczek
On 17.12.20 20:43, Brian Foster wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: Dear xfs developer, I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs filesystems on md raid6 raids. The stress test was essentially `cp -a`ing a Linux source repository w

Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-17 Thread Brian Foster
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote: > Dear xfs developer, > > I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs > filesystems on md raid6 raids. > > The stress test was essentially `cp -a`ing a Linux source repository with two > threads in parallel

v5.10.1 xfs deadlock

2020-12-17 Thread Donald Buczek
Dear xfs developer, I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs filesystems on md raid6 raids. The stress test was essentially `cp -a`ing a Linux source repository with two threads in parallel on each filesystem. After about on hour, the processes to one filesystem (