On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:09:39 -0600 (CST) Matt Stegman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any kernel patch that would allow Linux to properly recognize,
and execute gzipped executables?
I know I could use binfmt_misc to run a wrapper script:
decompress to /tmp/prog.decompressed
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
There are advantages: distinguish personal messages from mailing list
messages, and distinguish between different mailing lists. And
disadvantages - maybe only one: sacrificing valuable Subject: line
space.
The advantages can all be gained
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
Use procmail, that's what it's there for (and it won't affect your mail
reader, as long as you're using something reasonably sensible). I filter
on Sender.
Maybe I don't *want* the LKML messages in a seperate folder.
Maybe I just want to identify them
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
Those would all be your problems and I would suggest using a different account
for mail then.
Out of interest, how would that solve anything? So I use an ISP instead.
Then I have to download all my mail to home to read it. Talk about a
total waste of
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Matthew D. Pitts wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:05:34 -0500
From: Matthew D. Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mohammad A. Haque [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Harrold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: lkml
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
Is there a mail reader nowadays that doesn't let you do some sort of
filtering?
He uses Elm, which as far as I know is obsolete, unmaintained and
full of bugs and even has Y2K problems. That is the last I heard
anyway. Alan Cox would likely know
Hi,
I amtyping this without correcting -- allthe lost characters you see
(including spaces!) are exactly what the pseudo-tty driver does! This is
2.4.1 a it definitely (oh, see "nd" of the ave "and" disappeared? and
"above" turned into "ave"!) did work fine previously -- like in the days
of
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
PPS. No, my laptop is fine -- rebootingnto 2.2.x makes it type without
loosing characters...
just to clarify -- it does _not_ add characters -- the "loosing" vs
"losing" thing is my own frequent typo :)
Tigran
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 07:06:52PM -0500, Brian Gerst wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
SoundBlaster EMU8000 (RAM2048k)
ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20010208]
ACPI: SCI (IRQ9) allocation failed
ACPI: Subsystem enable failed
Trying to free free IRQ9
That seems to indicate acpi is
Hi Brian.
I'm sorry, patch itself was not attached in previous post :(
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin| Embedded systems software engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| PGP key: http://www.orbita1.ru/~pazke/AndreyPanin.asc
--- /linux/arch/i386/kernel/pci-pc.c.orig Mon Feb 12
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
Hi,
I amtyping this without correcting -- allthe lost characters you see
(including spaces!) are exactly what the pseudo-tty driver does! This is
2.4.1 a it definitely (oh, see "nd" of the ave "and" disappeared? and
"above" turned into "ave"!)
Marcelo Tosatti writes:
If lookup_swap_cache() finds a page in the swap cache, and that page was
in memory because of the swapin readahead, the cache is not flushed.
Here is a patch to fix the problem by always flushing the cache including
for pages in the swap cache:
-
-
" " == Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
net/network.a(sunrpc.o): In function `xprt_ping_reserve':
sunrpc.o(.text+0x4b94): undefined reference to `BUG'
sunrpc.o(.text+0x4b98): undefined reference to `BUG'
Looks like a problem in Trond's patches, also it doesn't happen
Hi,
Here's what i've found today in logs:
Feb 13 02:10:41 main kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
Feb 13 02:10:42 main last message repeated 143 times
Feb 13 02:10:47 main kernel: ed.
Feb 13 02:10:47 main kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
Feb 13 02:50:30 main
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote:
[cc-list trimmed]
That said, and while we're on the topic.. Does anyone have a
*PERFECT* recipe for procmail to REMOVE the stupid [Dummy] things
most GNU mailman lists and others prepend to the subject?
I am using the following to sort the
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:15:57PM -0800, george anzinger wrote:
Excuse me if I am off base here, but wouldn't an atomic operation be
better here. There are atomic inc/dec and add/sub macros for this. It
just seems that that is all that is needed here (from inspection of the
patch).
Trond Myklebust ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 13 February 2001 10:56:
Actually, since BUG() only seems to be defined on i386 platforms for
2.2.x, perhaps the easiest thing to do (unless somebody wants to
volunteer to backport all the `safe' definitions from 2.4.x) would be
to add the generic
Russell King wrote:
What was the problem? The old code seems to behave well on a virtual
address indexed virtual address tagged cache.
My case (SH-4) is: virtual address indexed, physical address tagged cache
(which has alias issue).
Suppose there's I/O to the physical page P
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:32:39PM +0100, I wrote:
I wrote a little palm app some time ago that can capture serial
console output. If anyone is interested I'll build a tar ball with
sources and binary.
It is now availiable at http://www.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/~ehrhardt/serial/
Sorry for the
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
That's the whole crux of the matter. For something like this, you *will*
drop data under certain circumstances. I suspect it's better to have
this done in a controlled manner, rather than stop completely, which is
what TCP would do.
Why do you
NIIBE Yutaka writes:
My case (SH-4) is: virtual address indexed, physical address tagged cache
(which has alias issue).
vivt caches have the same alias issue.
Suppose there's I/O to the physical page P asynchronously, and the
page is placed in the swap cache.
Unless someone else
PS. This only happens on this Dell latitude CPx (notice lost shift in
Latitude?) H450GT.
PPS. No, my laptop is fine -- rebootingnto 2.2.x makes it type without
loosing characters...
2.2 and 2.4 handle keyboard error cases quite differently (less so as of 2.2.18)
When you say 2.2.x works
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
Is there a mail reader nowadays that doesn't let you do some sort of
filtering?
He uses Elm, which as far as I know is obsolete, unmaintained and
full of bugs and even has Y2K problems. That is the last I heard
anyway. Alan Cox would likely
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:38:15AM +0100, Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
Hi Adam!
On Mon Feb 12, 2001 at 14:04:20 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
I've got a "Bull Express5800/Series" (dual P3) with a DAC1164 RAID
controller. The mainboard is ServerWorks based and however, 2.4.2-pre3
fails to
volunteer to backport all the `safe' definitions from 2.4.x) would be
to add the generic `*(int *)0 = 0' definition for local use by ping()
itself.
*(int *)0 doesnt work for all ports either
I'd rather let people suffer a little and fix BUG 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Suppose there's I/O to the physical page P asynchronously, and the
page is placed in the swap cache. It remains cache entry, say,
indexed kernel virtual address K. Then, process maps P at U. U and K
(may) indexes differently. The process will get the data from memory
(not the one in the
al goldstein wrote:
I have 2 ether cards 59x (eth0) and 509 (eth1). I have been adding 509
at boot in lilo.conf. Using this same config in 2.4.1 results in
the hardware addresses for the cards to be swapped. If I remove 509 from
Lilo I get the same result. Suggestions would be appreciated
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Is there a mail reader nowadays that doesn't let you do some sort of
filtering?
He uses Elm, which as far as I know is obsolete, unmaintained and
full of bugs and even has Y2K problems. That is the last I heard
anyway. Alan Cox would likely know more,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
PS. This only happens on this Dell latitude CPx (notice lost shift in
Latitude?) H450GT.
PPS. No, my laptop is fine -- rebootingnto 2.2.x makes it type without
loosing characters...
2.2 and 2.4 handle keyboard error cases quite differently
When you say 2.2.x works does that include 2.2.18.
no, I meant the plain 2.2.x as of Red Hat 7.0 which is labelled as
"2.2.16-22".
Can you try 2.2.18/2.2.19pre. Those if my first guess is right will behave
like 2.4 does to you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hi Andrew,
Keyboard internal, but... you are right -- this _only_ happens when the
laptop is plugged into the docking station... that could be an extra clue
(i.e. two PS/2 controllers simultaneously -- maybe the docking station one
needs to be somehow explicitly disabled).
How come I can't
Hi
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Meelis Roos wrote:
I also tried 2.4.1-ac10, but without acpi=no-idle, my machine crashes.
Part of the output is bellow:
ACPI: Core Subsystem Version [20010208]
ACPI: Subsystem enabled
ACPI: System firmware supports: C2 C3
ACPI: plvl2lat=10 plvl3lat=20
ACPI: C2
Ok, I decided to write this email inine on the console and... see? the
"inine" was supped to be "in pine" (not to mention the "supped" :)
Yes, I do lose characters when working in pine on the console!
So, it is not X-specific.
Now, what I was going to write this email about was -- I get the
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
Ok, I decided to write this email inine on the console and... see? the
"inine" was supped to be "in pine" (not to mention the "supped" :)
Well, an external keyboard in a Dell Latitude works just fine here.
Perhaps you should remove it from the docking station and
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:40:31AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:09:39 -0600 (CST) Matt Stegman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any kernel patch that would allow Linux to properly recognize,
and execute gzipped executables?
Perhaps you could put it in the
Hello,
This might not be the proper place to ask - my
apologies - but since it pertains to the Sony
Picturebook (C1VE - Crusoe) that people have been
discussing on this list anyway, I hope people don't
mind too much :)
I have RTFM but on the matter of enabling DRI for the
ATI Mobility video
Hi Alan,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
First, I'm glad I wasn't hallucinating, and that the mail did
indeed get seen by someone.
Second, instead of reverting, can't we simply move those two lines
up a bit:
Possibly but its a minor item that doesnt really matter anyway so leaving
Hi Admin,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Admin Mailing Lists wrote:
I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was
2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared
memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone
said the stats have been broken
Hi Alan,
I am now running 2.2.19-pre9 and it is working fine. Also, just in case, I
retyped this same message in pine in xterm and on the console. No
character loss whatsoever. Also, licq stopped losing characters as well.
I will continue using 2.2.19-pre9 until the evening and report anything
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
Well, an external keyboard in a Dell Latitude works just fine here.
Perhaps you should remove it from the docking station and test
with an external keyboard?
yes, I can try that. In the meantime you can see for yourself -- just plug
into the docking
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
Those would all be your problems and I would suggest using a different account
for mail then.
Out of interest, how would that solve anything? So I use an ISP instead.
Then I have to download all my mail to home to read it. Talk about a
total
Attached is a patch against 2.4.1-ac-XX which changes the initialization
of SigmaTel audio codecs. All recent reports of "no sound at all" with
Via audio have been users with this codec. With the Via audio driver,
you can find out if you have one of the problematic Sigmatel codecs like
so:
Possibly but its a minor item that doesnt really matter anyway so leaving it
is fine
No, I do not think that it's minor. We had to bring down running
application servers to be able to start another one, because the new
one couldn't create or attach the systemwide os-monitoring
segment
I have RTFM but on the matter of enabling DRI for the
ATI Mobility video chipset, which on that notebook is
a PCI model, there is practically nil information. The
DRI website mentions using PCI GART, but there is no
option for that in the kernel. How do I enable this?
You need to get
Having experienced a number of crashes with Xfree 4.0 with 2.4
kernels, that I wasn't getting with 2.2 kernels, a quick search on
the xfree Xpert mailing list reveals this:
You might consider UPX (http://upx.tsx.org)
Very cool. The beta version supports compressing the kernel
and "direct-to-memory" compression. I think it still
has the disadvantage of not sharing segments between many
instances of the same program. Is there any way of fixing
this? (probably would
Having experienced a number of crashes with Xfree 4.0 with 2.4
kernels, that I wasn't getting with 2.2 kernels, a quick search on
the xfree Xpert mailing list reveals this:
Yeah I've seen this claim repeatedly. XFree 4.0.2 crashes for me in similar
ways on 3dfx and matrox cards and it happens
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tony Gale wrote:
Having experienced a number of crashes with Xfree 4.0 with 2.4
kernels, that I wasn't getting with 2.2 kernels, a quick search on
the xfree Xpert mailing list reveals this:
Some people keep telling me that the way mutt handles headers is
'broken'. I've looked at it myself and don't see anything wrong and no
one explains their accusations.
Anyone know anything about this or are they blowing hot air?
Alan Cox wrote:
I've played with both pine and mutt. mutt is
Hi Alan,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
No, I do not think that it's minor. We had to bring down running
application servers to be able to start another one, because the
new one couldn't create or attach the systemwide os-monitoring
segment and thus refused to start. That's very bad
Yes, I understand that. But I never got any note that my fix is broken
and I still do not understand what's the concern.
Unless Im misreading the code the segment you poke at has potentially been
freed before it is written too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Could you please try the attached patch on top of latest Rik's patch?
Sure thing.. (few minutes later) no change.
That's because your problem requires a change to the
balancing between swap_out() and
This is a crash from nfsd on 2.4.2pre3. Cpuinfo below ksymoops output.
Top state at crash below ksymoops.
Exported disks are 3 partitions of one scsi disk device.
All three filesystems are ext2.
Scsi adapter is buslogic.
Two tulip network cards.
Two heavy use write-mostly nfs clients.
gcc
Hello,
After compiling files "ttime.c" and "ttime.h", I try to load them into
the kernel using the command /sbin/insmod ttime.o. However, the
following message suggests that a version conflict has prevented the
loading to be performed correctly:
"kernel-module version mismatch. ttime.o was
James Sutherland writes:
If the kernel starts spewing data faster than you can send it to the far
end, either the data gets dropped, or you block the kernel. Having the
kernel hang waiting to send a printk to the far end seems like a bad
situation...
It can actually be useful. Why? Lets
Hi Alan,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Yes, I understand that. But I never got any note that my fix is
broken and I still do not understand what's the concern.
Unless Im misreading the code the segment you poke at has
potentially been freed before it is written too.
Oh yes I was
Hello,
Anything in 2.4 isn't an option right now. I'm using, and am really happy
with, the ext3 journalling patch. I'm not planning on a 2.4 upgrade until
ext3 has been ported. Damn shame I don't have the skill to do that
myself...
ext2 compression would be great. First off, though, I'm
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Russell King wrote:
James Sutherland writes:
If the kernel starts spewing data faster than you can send it to the far
end, either the data gets dropped, or you block the kernel. Having the
kernel hang waiting to send a printk to the far end seems like a bad
Le 13 Feb 2001 07:58:56 -0600, Matt Stegman a crit :
Hello,
Anything in 2.4 isn't an option right now. I'm using, and am really happy
with, the ext3 journalling patch. I'm not planning on a 2.4 upgrade until
ext3 has been ported. Damn shame I don't have the skill to do that
myself...
"David S. Miller" wrote:
Andrew Morton writes:
Changing the memory copy function did make some difference
in my setup. But the performance drop on send(8k) is only approx 10%,
partly because I changed the way I'm testing it - `cyclesoak' is
now penalised more heavily by cache
On 13-Feb-2001 Alan Cox wrote:
Having experienced a number of crashes with Xfree 4.0 with 2.4
kernels, that I wasn't getting with 2.2 kernels, a quick search on
the xfree Xpert mailing list reveals this:
Yeah I've seen this claim repeatedly. XFree 4.0.2 crashes for me in
similar
ways on
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Marcus Ramos wrote:
Hello,
After compiling files "ttime.c" and "ttime.h", I try to load them into
the kernel using the command /sbin/insmod ttime.o. However, the
following message suggests that a version conflict has prevented the
loading to be performed correctly:
After upgrading to kernel 2.4.1 my box locked hard after starting the
regular arkeia backup. I had previously problems with MM on kernel
2.2.18 and 2.2.19pre2. My report a few days ago is still unanswered.
I would be glad if someone would be comment this time.
Here's the typed crash
People,
Not sure where to go from here but
( Yes I have read the FAQ )
For practical reasons, I have created some modification to the
Linux kernel. These changes were to make our implementation of
software more convenient (elegant). Essentially, I have modified the
select()
Martin Rode wrote:
After upgrading to kernel 2.4.1 my box locked hard after starting the
regular arkeia backup. I had previously problems with MM on kernel
2.2.18 and 2.2.19pre2. My report a few days ago is still unanswered.
I would be glad if someone would be comment this time.
Hi Andre,
hi lkml,
I need to add support for a maximum transfer mode selection on
drives and channels.
Reason: I have an ata flash disk as boot root disk, that can
only sucessfully do pio2 and it takes several minutes (5-10)
until it will use pio2. This is not acceptable for embedded
ext2_find_entry is quite expensive for directories with lots of entries
- what about caching the block and offset in the dcache?
Each dentry contains 2 values reserved for the filesystem:
dentry-d_fsdata
dentry-d_time
ext2 doesn't use them - yet.
I've written a small patch that caches the
Alan Cox wrote:
Yeah I've seen this claim repeatedly. XFree 4.0.2 crashes for me in
similar
ways on 3dfx and matrox cards and it happens with 2.2 kernels as well. What
makes me suspicious its XFree triggered is that there isnt really anything
XFree does that would trigger mm bugs on x86
On Tue Feb 13, 2001 at 12:20:14 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:38:15AM +0100, Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
On Mon Feb 12, 2001 at 14:04:20 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
I've got a "Bull Express5800/Series" (dual P3) with a DAC1164 RAID
controller. The mainboard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is a long-standing problem with 2.3 and 2.4 SMP kernels. I
believe it is a kernel bug and isn't the XFree86 project's problem.
The problem does not exist on 2.2 SMP kernels nor on 2.3/4 UP kernels.
The symptoms are random segfaults in perfectly fine
"N. Jason Kleinbub" wrote:
People,
Not sure where to go from here but
( Yes I have read the FAQ )
For practical reasons, I have created some modification to the
Linux kernel. These changes were to make our implementation of
software more convenient (elegant).
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Michl Alexandre Salim wrote:
This might not be the proper place to ask - my
apologies - but since it pertains to the Sony
Picturebook (C1VE - Crusoe) that people have been
discussing on this list anyway, I hope people don't
mind too much :)
I have RTFM but on the matter of
Hi folks,
sorry for the silly question, but i can't get it to work :
I have linux-2.4.1 unpacked, configured and installed.
Now i want to apply Alan Cox patche (linux-2.4.1-ac9), but i always get
these errors :
[root@space src]# cat /home/puck/patch-2.4.1-ac9 | patch -p0
can't find file to
Hi all,
I have a machine with kernel 2.4.1 . It exports some volume via NFS
(installed with RedHat 7.0 + custom 2.4.1 kernel)
NFSD dies unexpectedly with a Oops (see below).
At the beginning, I have 8 NFSD processes, but suddenly, they all die. I
can't see why it happens, because the machine is
Em Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 04:03:02PM +0100, Thomas Foerster escreveu:
Hi folks,
sorry for the silly question, but i can't get it to work :
I have linux-2.4.1 unpacked, configured and installed.
Now i want to apply Alan Cox patche (linux-2.4.1-ac9), but i always get
these errors :
Alan's patches are installed like this:
# cd /usr/src
# tar xIf linux-2.4.1.tar.bz2
# cd linux
# patch -sp1 ../patch-2.4.1-ac6
# chown -R root:root .
Note the "-sp1" and that you need to be _inside_ the tree. Also, you don't
need to waste another process ("cat") and create a pipe, just use
|+++ linux.ac/CREDITS Fri Feb 9 13:19:13 2001
--
File to patch:
[root@space src]#
Do i have to create linux.vanilla and linux.ac, or what's the magic?! :-)
Calling it linux.ac is one answer. Another one is
cd linux
patch -p1 ../patchfile
-
To unsubscribe from
from linux (/usr/src/linux) directory, if the patch is
up a level (/usr/src):
patch -p1 ../patch-2.4.1-ac9
hth,
bradley mclain
ps -- probably a google search with the string 'how to
install ac patches' will find some instructions for
you.
--- Thomas Foerster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
i have been running 4.0.2 on my smp system using the 2.4.1 kernel. the
one thing is, i was using the xfree out of precision insite's cvs with
the g400 binary-only hal lib dri module loaded. every-so-often,
especially when closing windows or switching virtual desktops, the
kernel would crash.
Martin Rode wrote:
Run this oops message through ksymoops please. It will make debugging
it alot easier.
Since I did not compile the kernel myself, ksymoops is not too happy with
what is has to analyse the dump. I tried compile the Mandrake kernel myself
but there seems to be
From: Elmer Joandi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I dont know, if it is bug or feature, but,
USB mouse jumps around (between) /dev/input/mouse0 and mouse1
when taken out and put back in(to same connector), 2.4.0 kernel.
Annoys, should not be the default behaviour, IMHO.
If USB mice
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
If USB mice had serial numbers (like some USB storage devices
do), then we could tell that it's the same mouse on the
same connector and not change from mouse0 to mouse1.
Currently it looks like a new device attachment.
One possible solution is
Hi Alan,
The only case in schedule_timeout() which does not call schedule() does
set tsk-state = TASK_RUNNING explicitly before returning. Therefore, any
code which unconditionally calls schedule_timeout() (and, of course
schedule()) does not need to set TASK_RUNNING afterwards.
I have seen
From: Elmer Joandi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
If USB mice had serial numbers (like some USB storage devices
do), then we could tell that it's the same mouse on the
same connector and not change from mouse0 to mouse1.
Currently it looks like
I have RTFM but on the matter of enabling DRI for the
ATI Mobility video chipset, which on that notebook is
a PCI model, there is practically nil information. The
DRI website mentions using PCI GART, but there is no
option for that in the kernel. How do I enable this?
You need to get
I believe that, in general, we want working fixup routines so the we don't
have to rely on the BIOS. That said, it's apparent that the ServerWorks
routines are broken. Fixing them is going to be troublesome, given ServerWorks
attitude towards releasing specs. It's on my list of things to try to
I had problems with XFree86 4.0 and 4.0.1 locking solidly up under Linux 2.4.x
after about 10mins until I upgraded to XFree86 4.0.2. Now it seems rock solid.
XFree86 3.3.x was always okay.
I've got a Dual-PII machine and an NVidia GeForce.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
Hi Alan,
The only case in schedule_timeout() which does not call schedule() does
set tsk-state = TASK_RUNNING explicitly before returning. Therefore, any
code which unconditionally calls schedule_timeout() (and, of course
schedule()) does not
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.1-ac11
o Hack the setup code to do the right thing for (me)
Cyrix processors. Cpuid on cyrix should now work
o Change sigmatel codec inits (Jeff Garzik)
o Revised TLB shootdown
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tim Wright wrote:
I believe that, in general, we want working fixup routines so the we don't
have to rely on the BIOS. That said, it's apparent that the ServerWorks
routines are broken. Fixing them is going to be troublesome, given ServerWorks
attitude towards releasing
** Reply to message from "Mike A. Harris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 03:53:13 -0500 (EST)
I disagree, and while I may be in the minority on this list, I am certainly
not in the minority across the board, given that virtually every mailing list
I am subscribed to DOES prepend a tag
Does it make sense to try and keep up with the latest and greatest in
chipsets
when there is a hardware independent way of doing things? You may be able
to
get information on current chipsets, but every time something changes, the
kernel may be broken for a time. If we rely on the BIOS, the
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
Junichi Morita and I have worked out how to access the crusoe
"longrun" settings on the crusoe based VAIO. This allows you to enable
power saving mode and slow the cpu down. It should help battery life a
lot.
There is no documentation? I
LDT allocated for cloned task!
I'm seeing this message come up fairly often while running vanilla
2.4.2-pre3 on my dual Celeron system. I don't think I saw it before
while running 2.4.1, but I may have just missed it.
My system has been up around two days and has 11 of these messages in the
Hi Alan,
The attached patch makes tmpfs behave more like other fs's. Apparently
perl expects this.
Greetings
Christoph
diff -uNr 2.4.1-ac10/mm/shmem.c 2.4.1-ac10-nlink/mm/shmem.c
--- 2.4.1-ac10/mm/shmem.c Mon Feb 12 15:01:47 2001
+++ 2.4.1-ac10-nlink/mm/shmem.c Tue Feb 13
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote:
I can see that the error codes are actually the values of ESR both before
and after the apic_write() call. I see that the codes are the modulus'd
value before and after the apic_write call. What I'm not understanding is
how to translate that into
To address the concerns of Andi Kleen, with a good suggestion from Richard
Johnson, I have revised my previous patch attempt. Please check this out
and comment.
Changelog:
1) use get_gendisk() instead of walking array manually
2) pass in struct instead of guessing..
+ struct {
+
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:59:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote:
Hi,
Here's what i've found today in logs:
Feb 13 02:10:41 main kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
Feb 13 02:10:42 main last message repeated 143 times
Feb 13 02:10:47 main kernel: ed.
Feb 13 02:10:47
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Timur Tabi wrote:
Which is retarded. The subject line is for the subject. Other
headers exist for letting one know where they came from.
There's only one problem with this. It assumes that for every
mailing list you are on, you will have a folder into which all
such
The attached patch makes tmpfs behave more like other fs's. Apparently
perl expects this.
A few apps assume this. All of them are buggy. I'll apply the patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
1 - 100 of 444 matches
Mail list logo
