Hi Mark!
This is a well known problem. nvidia-0.9-769 does NOT WORK WITH
2.4.X agpgart, either use nvagp (not possible for ali chipsets)
or disable agp (Option NvAgp 0) for the time being.
Next version will hopefully fix this!
See #nvidia on openprojects.net
Best wishes
Norbert
--
ciao
On 22 Apr 2001, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Alan == Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alan The recommended compilers for non x86 are different too - eg you
Alan need 2.96 gcc for IA64, you need 2.95 not egcs for mips and so
Alan on.
In principle you just need 2.7.2.3 for m68k, but someone
David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric W. Biederman writes:
In building a patch for 2.4.3 I also discovered that we are not taking
the mmap_sem around do_brk in the exec paths.
Does that really matter?
In the library loader I can certainly see it making a difference.
Who
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 07:04:21PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
We will announce when they are available ASAP and would appreciate if
people like Alan Cox, Andrea Arcangeli and Andreas Dilger
could check them *before* we start submitting them to Linus.
I'll be glad to help look over them.
Hi Linus,
The current 2.4.4-pre series assumes that NFSv3 is always fully LFS
capable. This is of course not the case on 32bit architectures such as
the 2.2.x series.
The following patch to fs/nfs/inode.c corrects this bug by using the
NFSPROC3_FSINFO call to provide the maximum supported
IMHO the POSIX is doable to comply with POSIX. Probably not what many
of the RT freaks expect, but doable. I'm tuning the nanoseconds for a
while now...
Ulrich
On 17 Apr 2001, at 11:53, george anzinger wrote:
I was thinking that it might be good to remove the POSIX API for the
kernel and
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:25:15PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
We will announce when they are available ASAP and would appreciate if
people like Alan Cox, Andrea Arcangeli and Andreas Dilger
could check them *before* we start submitting them to Linus.
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Using /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac12/kernel/drivers/char/drm/radeon.o
/lib/modules/2.4.3-ac12/kernel/drivers/char/drm/radeon.o: unresolved
symbol rwsem_up_write_wake
/lib/modules/2.4.3-ac12/kernel/drivers/char/drm/radeon.o: unresolved
symbol
Jens Axboe wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Hi,
building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields:
oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o
depmod:
Hi, everyone.
One other gcc-3.0 warning (apart from the classic multiline strings)
I do not know if it can be important.
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.3-ac12/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -
O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
-march=i686
Did you try nesting more than one su -? The first one after a boot
works for me - every other one fails.
Same here: the first su - works OK, but a second nested one hangs:
It appears to be a bug in PAM. Someone seems to reply on parent/child running
order and just got caught out
-
To
And of course since much of the code in the kernel is built on the
copy a good example neglecting the locking without a big comment,
invites trouble elsewhere like in elf_load_library. Where we could
have multiple threads running.
Out of interest: does anything, anywhere, actually use
Following up on myself, I replaced the contents of /usr/X11R6 server with
the standard 4.0.3 RPMs that come with RH 7.1 and it made no difference.
Also, if it's important my video card is a Voodoo 5 5500.
To follow up on my followup, I can now reproduce this 100% and get the
Trying to
Strange trace but it looks like a bug in the -ac experimental multithreaded
core dump patches. I've got a couple of other reports consistent with them
being broken somewhere
Does it have to be something like mozilla (xmms also probably breaks it) that
does this. If so I suspect its specific to
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:07:53AM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote:
In dmi_scan.c there is the func:
static __init int disable_ide_dma(struct dmi_blacklist *d)
But now it is unused (intentionally ?):
static __initdata struct dmi_blacklist dmi_blacklist[]={
#if 0==
Hi,
I have seen several of these messages in my kernel log this morning. The system
responded to ping but won't allow me to login. What is VM? What causes these
errors and how can I prevent it from happening again?
Thank you in advance for any help.
-march=i686-c -o dmi_scan.o dmi_scan.c
dmi_scan.c:158: warning: `disable_ide_dma' defined but not used
In dmi_scan.c there is the func:
static __init int disable_ide_dma(struct dmi_blacklist *d)
But now it is unused (intentionally ?):
Intentionally for now
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
In update_wall_one_tick() function, we have following
xtime.tv_usec += tick + time_adjust_step.
where tick = (100 + hz/2)/hz.
In systems where we have TSC why we cannot use that to update xtime.tv_usec. It
should give better time estimate. and the values that are
Manuel McLure wrote:
On 2001.04.22 14:38 Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
I'm having a problem with su - on ac11/ac12. ac5 doesn't show the
problem.
The problem is easy to reproduce - go to a console, log in as root, do
an
su - (this will succeed) and then another su -. The second
kernel oops messages. (Ran through ksymoops) It looks like it could be
an NVidia driver problem, but I doubt it as I run this with AGP at work with
Wrong mailing list. Take it up with nvidia.
no problems. I'm wondering if anyone else has AGP working with the
(new?) ALI AGP code.
Nvidia
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 21:45:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try turning off DRI in XF86Config-4.
Please let me know if this helps.
Yes, removing agpgart gives me back earlier behaviour: The notebook
wakes up after suspending with following restrictions:
1. Internal NIC and maybe even
Hi,
I've just completed the first draft of a new device driver for the FarSite
Communications, FarSync T2P and T4P cards. These cards are intelligent
synchronous serial cards supporting 2 or 4 ports running at up to 8Mbps with
X.21, V.35 or V.24 signalling.
This mail is basically a call for
The EIP resolved most often to cont_prepare_write() in
fs/buffer. A disassembly suggests line 1802 in buffer.c
[2.4.3ac11]. That is around a memset() between
__block_prepare_write() and __block_commit_write() calls
within the while loop. Most other addresses were within
the same while loop.
I really would wish folks would not choose Alan as the first place
to send the patch. I'm not directly accusing anyone of it, but it
I asked him about it on irc and why it was needed, so it sort of makes a lot
of sense he emailed me it 8)
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
I think lib/brlock.c need to be fixed as:
--- lib/brlock.cTue Apr 25 05:59:56 2000
+++ lib/brlock.c.fixed Mon Apr 23 19:56:43 2001
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
int i;
for (i = 0; i smp_num_cpus; i++)
- write_lock(__brlock_array[idx] + cpu_logical_map(i));
+
Okay, I'll try and do this as best I can from the REPORTING-BUGS file, I can't
post any Oops information or anything, because it's not a fatal problem.
Last week, I replaced an HD in my machine, to make life easier copying things
over, I made it /dev/hdc (to replace /dev/hdb) and made it
Hi David,
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, David L. Parsley wrote:
I'm still working on a packaging system for diskless
(quasi-embedded) devices. The root filesystem is all tmpfs, and I
attach packages inside it. Since symlinks in a tmpfs filesystem
cost 4k each (ouch!), I'm considering using mount
Mark Swanson wrote:
Hello,
When I enable AGP on my ALI system 2D seems to work fine but 3D causes
kernel oops messages. (Ran through ksymoops) It looks like it could be
an NVidia driver problem, but I doubt it as I run this with AGP at work with
no problems. I'm wondering if anyone else
Hi.
I tried to compile kernel 2.4.3 with applied ac-12 patch
and make bzImage gives me the following error:
make all_targets
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all_targets'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib'
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:59:52PM +0800, Xiong Zhao wrote:
hello.on linux we will see a new domino server process/thread is
created for each client.how does linux do this?does it use
pthread?using fork or clone or someway else?
pthreads are modeled on top of the clone() system call.
what's
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:44:07PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
I really would wish folks would not choose Alan as the first place
to send the patch. I'm not directly accusing anyone of it, but it
does appear that often AC is used as a back door to get a change
in. While this scheme most
Using gcc version pgcc-2.95.3 19991024 (AthlonGCC-0.0.3ex3.1)
I can't compile 2.4.3.I get the follow message:
init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
init/main.o(.text.init+0x65): undefined reference to
`__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
Can anyone help me?
-
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o
try this (after you have applied the patch for lvm 0.9.1_beta7) ...
Jeff
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--- /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c.org Mon Apr 23 21:11:32 2001
David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[BTW, another solution is to truly support opaque handles to kernel
objects; I believe David Howells is already working on something like
this for Wine?
Yes. However, it uses a different system call set to use them. They
Jeff Chua wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o
try this (after you have applied the patch for lvm 0.9.1_beta7) ...
Jeff
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--- /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c.org
Hey guys,
Im trying to get the 2.4.3 Kernel on a Dell dimension 8100 (p4, 1.3ghz).
The 2.2* kernels work fine but when I start up with the new kernel it
dies at the line cpu:0, clocks:0, slice:0. It also says something about
wierd, boot kernel (CPU#0) not found in BIOS. There is also a
From: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[BTW, another solution is to truly support opaque handles to kernel
objects; I believe David Howells is already working on something like
this for Wine?
Yes. However, it uses a
Michael J Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wierd, boot kernel (CPU#0) not found in BIOS. There is also a message
do you have SMP or APIC enabled ?
--
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
--Chmouel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, David L. Parsley wrote:
What I'm not sure of is which solution is actually 'better' - I'm
guessing that performance-wise, neither will make a noticable
difference, so I guess memory usage would be the deciding factor. If I
Bindings are faster on lookup. For obvious
Hello,
If I try to compile a 2.4.x (0-3) kernel for my SGI 540 Workstation and I
enable SGI Virtual Workstation support (under general setup) the compilation
stops with the error kernel.o: In function 'enable_irq' etc
Previous kernels, such as 2.2.19 compile without any problem (same
hello!
short version:
this is the international crypto patch, which is built outside of
the kernel source tree. you don't even have to reboot (unless your
kernel didn't have loop devices enabled, or some other unthought
situation exists... :)
As a response to Jari's loop-AES crypto
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 05:52:37AM +, you [Subba Rao] claimed:
Hi,
I have seen several of these messages in my kernel log this morning. The system
What kernel version.
responded to ping but won't allow me to login. What is VM?
Virtual memory subsystem in Linux kernel.
What causes
Bram Smout wrote:
If I try to compile a 2.4.x (0-3) kernel for my SGI 540 Workstation and I
enable SGI Virtual Workstation support (under general setup) the compilation
stops with the error kernel.o: In function 'enable_irq' etc
SGI Visual Workstation support has been unmaintained for
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:12:14PM +0200, Bram Smout wrote:
If I try to compile a 2.4.x (0-3) kernel for my SGI 540 Workstation and I
enable SGI Virtual Workstation support (under general setup) the compilation
stops with the error kernel.o: In function 'enable_irq' etc
Previous
I believe APIC is enabled, it does some kind of check for it. Everything
is pretty much default. I read that the APIC can cause interrupt
problems, should I disable it? If so, is that done in the kernel config?
Mike
Michael J Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wierd, boot kernel
Hi guys,
This patch is not meant to replace Neil Brown's knfsd ops stuff, the
goal was to whip up something that had a chance of getting into 2.4.x,
and that might be usable by the AFS guys too. Neil's patch tries to
address a bunch of things that I didn't, and looks better for the
long run.
Michael J Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe APIC is enabled, it does some kind of check for it. Everything
is pretty much default. I read that the APIC can cause interrupt
problems, should I disable it? If so, is that done in the kernel config?
yes APIC cause problems for me on
Is documantation available for the VW?
Nick
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Erik Mouw wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:12:14PM +0200, Bram Smout wrote:
If I try to compile a 2.4.x (0-3) kernel for my SGI 540 Workstation and I
enable SGI Virtual Workstation support (under general setup) the
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 04:13:47PM +0300, mythos wrote:
Using gcc version pgcc-2.95.3 19991024 (AthlonGCC-0.0.3ex3.1)
I can't compile 2.4.3.I get the follow message:
init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
init/main.o(.text.init+0x65): undefined reference to
`__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
make:
Jürgen Herrmann wrote:
Hi.
I tried to compile kernel 2.4.3 with applied ac-12 patch
and make bzImage gives me the following error:
.
make all_targets
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/lib'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all_targets'.
make[2]: Leaving
Attn: Sales Manager
If you are outsourcing or need to expand your sales force for the short term or long
term contract, Telexpand will create a tailored campaign to
guarantee you and your product success.
We are an established, full service call center with a completely trained staff of 70
David,
your report sounds like a problem that we have seen in the test lab, but no
one has reported in the field... yet. :)
if the problem is the same as we have seen... unloading the driver and
reloading the driver should also clear up the problem. but typically the
problem only occurs after
I have already sent a patch to Alan and Linus on this issue. Linus has
never responed and Alan said he would look into it in the middle of April.
Nothing is new at this point
-Original Message-
From: PhiloVivero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 12:12 AM
To: [EMAIL
Hi Ingo,
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:43:27PM +0200, Christoph Rohland wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, David L. Parsley wrote:
attach packages inside it. Since symlinks in a tmpfs filesystem
cost 4k each (ouch!), I'm considering using mount --bind for
Hi people,
I'm reading through various pieces of source code to try and get an
understanding of how the kernel works (with the hope that I'll
eventually be able to contribute something really usefull, but you've
got to start somewhere ;)
While reading through the source I've stumbled across
This machine is has a 400MHz PII, Adaptec AIC-7895, 631 MB of memory,
and about 512 Meg of swap).
When compiling the kernel (2.2.19) I changed __FD_SETSIZE in
/usr/include/bits/types.h from 1024 to 8192.
(Increased number of file descriptors)
The following is executed at boot time:
# More file
Hallo,
I just tried to compile latest kernel 2.4.4pre6 with following error
output. Unfortunately I don't have no idea what this wants to tell me.
Probably something about those rw_semaphores I have recently read about in
lkml.
Regards,
Axel Siebenwirth
make[1]: Entering directory
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 04:54:02PM +0200, Christoph Rohland wrote:
The question is: How? If you do it like ramfs, you cannot swap
these symlinks and this is effectively a mlock(symlink) operation
allowed for normal users. - BAD!
How about storing it into the inode structure if
Jesper Juhl wrote:
Hi people,
I'm reading through various pieces of source code to try and get an
understanding of how the kernel works (with the hope that I'll
eventually be able to contribute something really usefull, but you've
got to start somewhere ;)
While reading through the
On 2001.04.23 02:38 Alan Cox wrote:
Strange trace but it looks like a bug in the -ac experimental
multithreaded
core dump patches. I've got a couple of other reports consistent with
them
being broken somewhere
Does it have to be something like mozilla (xmms also probably breaks it)
Using gcc version pgcc-2.95.3 19991024 (AthlonGCC-0.0.3ex3.1)
I can't compile 2.4.3.I get the follow message:
init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
init/main.o(.text.init+0x65): undefined reference to
`__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
Can anyone help me?
Thats
dies at the line cpu:0, clocks:0, slice:0. It also says something about
wierd, boot kernel (CPU#0) not found in BIOS. There is also a message
This message is printed when the kernel finds it is running on a processor
not listed in the MP table. Basically your machine seems to have broken
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
the reason why lookup_swap_cache() locks the page is due to a valid race,
but the solution excessive: it tries to keep the lookup atomic against
destroyers of the page, page_launder() and reclaim_page(). But it does not
really need the page lock for
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 05:20:35PM +0200, Ríkharður Egilsson wrote:
Is there anything I can do to prevent this from happening ?
This (squid) server, serves about 50 requests/sec, so 2 minutes of downtime
means a lot of unhappy customers.
The atomic allocations for incoming packets probably
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 04:54:02PM +0200, Christoph Rohland wrote:
The question is: How? If you do it like ramfs, you cannot swap
these symlinks and this is effectively a mlock(symlink) operation
allowed for normal users. - BAD!
Jesper Juhl writes:
Hi people,
I'm reading through various pieces of source code to try and get an
understanding of how the kernel works (with the hope that I'll
eventually be able to contribute something really usefull, but you've
got to start somewhere ;)
While reading through the
Alon Ziv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously... since they're handles, not FDs...
[BTW, are you using Windows' idea of storing the objects in process space,
in a page that's inaccessible to the app itself, and passing pointers into
this page as the handles?]
No... I grab a page in kernel
Both mozilla and aviplay (which are both multithreaded) trigger this - I
haven't tried with xmms. Simpler programs like xclock or cat don't trigger
it.
Thanks. I'll revert the core dump stuff for 2.4.4-ac unless anyone cares to
fix the fix
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Sean Hunter wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 05:26:27PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
last entry should not have a trailing comma.
Sadly not. This isn't a gcc thing: ANSI says that trailing comma is ok (KR
Second edition, A8.7 - pg 218 219 in my copy)
You are right, I just consulted my own
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 04:13:47PM +0300, mythos wrote:
init/main.o(.text.init+0x65): undefined reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
This is a FAQ! (sorry, but I don't know if it is in a FAQ or not).
IIRC, you can't use pgcc to compile linux kernels.
Then the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've just completed the first draft of a new device driver for the FarSite
Communications, FarSync T2P and T4P cards. These cards are intelligent
synchronous serial cards supporting 2 or 4 ports running at up to 8Mbps with
X.21, V.35 or V.24 signalling.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I'm having a problem with "su -" on ac11/ac12. ac5 doesn't show the
problem.
The problem is easy to reproduce - go to a console, log in as root, do an
"su -" (this will succeed) and then another "su -". The second "su -"
should hang - ps shows it
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:58:25AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Marcus Meissner wrote:
Hi,
This moves pci_enable_device in the es1371 driver before any resource
access and also replaces the RSRCISIOREGION by just pci_resource_flags
as suggested by Jeff.
Tested and verified.
Righto, first post to the list, here goes:
I'm writing a char device driver for a dsp card that drives a motion
platform. The basic flow is I basically have to reset the card and upload
an executable file to it, and then poke the card to run it. Once this is
done, I can issue instructions to the
Marcus Meissner wrote:
Hmm, I think I spotted all places in the probe function. I also return
-ENODEV in case we can't request_region() or request_irq().
Some drivers use EBUSY, some ENOMEM, some ENODEV there, is there
any standard return value?
request_region/request_mem_region - EBUSY
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:05:03AM -0500, Victor Zandy wrote:
We have found that one of our programs can cause system-wide
corruption of the x86 FPU under 2.2.16 and 2.2.17. That is, after we
run this program, the FPU gives bad results to all subsequent
processes.
A few comments, not sure
Richard Gooch wrote:
Jesper Juhl writes:
All the above does is to remove the last comma from 3 enumeration
lists. I know that gcc has no problem with that, but to be strictly
correct the last entry should not have a trailing comma.
But it's more people-friendly to have that trailing
george anzinger wrote:
Marcus Ramos wrote:
Hello,
I am using usleep in an application under RH7 kernel 2.4.2. However,
when I bring its argument down to 20 miliseconds (20.000 microseconds)
or less, this seems to be ignored by the function (or the machine's hw
timer), which
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:58:37AM -0400, John Weber wrote:
There appears to be quite a difference between the memory usage reported
by top
(immediately after boot and minus all user processes) and that reported
by the kernel
during boot. Can anyone give me any hints as to why this might
On 23 Apr 01 at 17:06, Matt wrote:
struct instruction_t {
__s16 code;
__s16 rxlen;
__s16 *rxbuf;
__s16 txlen;
__s16 *txbuf;
};
You should reorder fields, starting with largest fields and going down
to smaller ones. That ways you'll not have troubles with alignment when
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
There seems to be one more reason, take a look at the function
read_swap_cache_async() in swap_state.c, around line 240:
you are right - i thought about that issue too and assumed it works like
the pagecache (which first reads the page without hashing
And there is very low chance that kmalloc() for
anything bigger than 4KB will succeed. You should either use
vmalloc unconditionally, or at least as fallback.
The phrase 'very low chance' is inaccurate.
How do you think NFS works with -rsize, -wsize 4096?
kmalloc() uses get_free_pages() to
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Jonathan Morton wrote:
There seems to be one more reason, take a look at the function
read_swap_cache_async() in swap_state.c, around line 240:
/*
* Add it to the swap cache and read its contents.
*/
lock_page(new_page);
Does anyone know the status of the alpha driver? Source for the driver is
available from vendors, but only compiles on 2.2.x intel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
you are right - i thought about that issue too and assumed it works like
the pagecache (which first reads the page without hashing it, then tries
to add the result to the pagecache and throws away the page if anyone else
finished it already), but
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, John Weber wrote:
There appears to be quite a difference between the memory usage reported
by top
(immediately after boot and minus all user processes) and that reported
by the kernel
during boot. Can anyone give me any hints as to why this might happen?
I am
Dupuis, Don wrote:
I have already sent a patch to Alan and Linus on this issue. Linus has
never responed and Alan said he would look into it in the middle of April.
Nothing is new at this point
-Original Message-
From: PhiloVivero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 05:06:48PM +0100, Matt wrote:
I'm writing a char device driver for a dsp card that drives a motion
platform.
Can you elaborate on the dsp card? Is it freely programmable? I'm
working on a project to support this kind of stuff via a
dedicated subsystem for Linux.
The
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 04:52:53PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
RCS file: /inst/cvs/linux/include/asm-i386/bugs.h,v
retrieving revision 1.2.2.16
diff -u -r1.2.2.16 bugs.h
--- include/asm/bugs.h2001/01/18 13:56:53 1.2.2.16
+++ include/asm/bugs.h2001/04/23 15:45:28
@@
Andre/LKML,
I am still working on this, but would appreciate some help from
whomever owns this driver proper. I have discovered that the
3Ware drivers are not updating the gendisk_head with devices
reported and exposed to user space as /dev/sda, sdb, etc. The
adapter driver does correctly
On 23 Apr 2001 18:11:48 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:05:03AM -0500, Victor Zandy wrote:
We have found that one of our programs can cause system-wide
corruption of the x86 FPU under 2.2.16 and 2.2.17. That is, after we
run this program, the FPU gives bad
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:34:36PM -0700, J Sloan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Friend:
YOU CAN make over a half million dollars every 4 to 5 months from
your home for a one time investment of only twenty five U.S.
Dollars.
This did not originate from toyota.com - The
Since ac9 I started having a lockup when initializing KDE 2.1.1.
Did not think that much about it since my installation has had libs
upgraded and patched for months. Today I decided to do a clean
distribution install and after I had the same problem. Removing
each module one at a time I finally
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Gary White (Network Administrator) wrote:
There are no emu10k1 changes from ac9 up to ac12...
Do you have a VIA motherboard by any chance?
Rui Sousa
Since ac9 I started having a lockup when initializing KDE 2.1.1.
Did not think that much about it since my installation
+ printk(KERN_EMERG This is usually caused by a buggy compiler (perhaps
pgcc?)\n);
+ printk(KERN_EMERG Cannot continue.\n);
+ for (;;) ;
At least make the final printk a panic..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
Hi all,
I have a Dell Latitude with an ATI mach64 in it (Rage 3D Mobility Pro) that
doesn't like the atyfb driver (can't get it to work no matter what the
resolution). Who should I mention that to and/or what information should I
send about it?
Thanks,
Aaron
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
The i810 audio driver is broken on my Fujitsu Lifebook
S-4546. All output is just noise. Here is a snip's from
the kernel log.
Intel 810 + AC97 Audio, version 0.02, 19:41:16 Apr 23 2001
PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:00.1
PCI: The same IRQ used for device 00:00.2
PCI: The same IRQ used
Yep I do. But looking at patch-2.4.3-ac10, there are lots of changes
to the emu10k1 driver.
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Gary White (Network Administrator) wrote:
There are no emu10k1 changes from ac9 up to ac12...
Do you have a VIA motherboard by any chance?
Rui Sousa
Since ac9 I started
Looking gain at the patches there wa only a few trivial changes made to the
audio.c, cardmi.h, mixer.c amd timer.h code.
Yep I do. But looking at patch-2.4.3-ac10, there are lots of changes
to the emu10k1 driver.
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Gary White (Network Administrator) wrote:
There are
1 - 100 of 465 matches
Mail list logo
